Skip to main content

Security report for ogressportacentrs.lv

Ogres novada sporta centrs · Government · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ogres novada sporta centrs is a municipal sports education institution serving the Ogres novads region in Latvia. It provides professional and interest-based sports education programs across multiple disciplines including athletics, football, handball, weightlifting, orienteering, artistic gymnastics, and canoeing. The center operates under the local government and targets residents, youth, and sports enthusiasts in the community. The website is built on modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, with content managed via Payload CMS and hosted likely on QuickStack infrastructure. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides rich content including news, events, and detailed descriptions of sports facilities. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. Contact information and social media presence are clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and serves its community well, though improvements in privacy compliance and security headers are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ogressportacentrs.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization is a government-affiliated sports center focused on education and community sports services. Its business model is public sector driven, providing sports education and facility management. The target market includes local residents, children, youth, and sports professionals. The center maintains active communication channels via social media and organizes community events, indicating engagement and growth potential. The website content and structure support its role as a trusted local sports institution. No commercial or revenue-generating activities are evident on the site, consistent with its public service nature.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present, which could improve incident response readiness. No signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly monitor and update third-party libraries and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimizations to improve user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ogres novada sporta centrs
Description
Ogres novada sporta centrs is a professional sports education institution founded by the Ogres municipality and subordinated to the Ogres municipality council's Education, Culture and Sports Department. It offers professional and interest-based sports education programs in athletics, football, handball, weightlifting, orienteering, artistic gymnastics, and canoeing.
Key services
Professional sports education programs, Interest-based sports education, Sports facilities management, Event organization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about sports center activities and facilities.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; no domain registration details extracted.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information includes official email and phone number with clear context.
  5. Social media links to Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube are present and active.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Website uses modern React/Next.js framework and Payload CMS backend.
  9. Content is in Latvian language targeting local community and sports participants.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React and Next.js framework combined with Payload CMS for content management, indicating a contemporary and maintainable tech stack. Hosting appears to be on QuickStack infrastructure, with media assets served from s3.quickstack.lv. The site is mobile-optimized and loads asynchronously with multiple JavaScript chunks, supporting good performance. However, no analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which may limit marketing insights but improves privacy. The site lacks advanced SEO meta tags beyond basic Open Graph and Twitter cards. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for enhancements in SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ogressportacentrs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ogressportacentrs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.