Skip to main content

Security report for oferteo.pl

Oferteo · Other · Poland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oferteo is a well-established Polish online marketplace founded in 2008 that connects customers with companies offering a wide range of services and products, including construction, finance, insurance, legal, and more. The platform enables users to post free requests for offers and compare bids from various firms, targeting businesses, institutions, and private individuals. Oferteo maintains a strong market position in Poland with a large user base and extensive service categories. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as JavaScript, Tailwind CSS, and integrates analytics and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, and TrustCommander. The platform is optimized for mobile and desktop, with good performance and accessibility features. It uses HTTPS with strong security headers, ensuring secure communication and protection against common web vulnerabilities. From a security perspective, Oferteo demonstrates good practices including encrypted connections, secure forms, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks publicly available security policies or incident response contacts, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. The absence of WHOIS data is likely due to privacy protection, which is justified for this business type. Overall, Oferteo presents a professional, secure, and user-friendly platform with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, extensive business information, and strong branding. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response policies, and maintaining regular audits of third-party scripts to mitigate potential risks.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oferteo.pl

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
48
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Oferteo operates as a B2B and B2C marketplace in Poland, facilitating lead generation and service procurement across multiple sectors, primarily construction and professional services. Its competitive advantage lies in its broad service coverage, free posting of requests, and integration with mobile apps on major platforms. Revenue likely derives from premium listings, advertising, and lead sales. The platform targets a diverse customer base including companies, institutions, and private consumers. Its partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and app stores, enhancing reach and engagement. The company shows signs of maturity with consistent branding, professional content, and a large service catalog, positioning it as a market leader in Poland's service marketplace segment.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and secure form handling. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of modern security practices such as Content Security Policy and Referrer Policy is evident. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure programs or security.txt files. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance documentation and incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks.
  5. Enhance transparency by detailing data retention policies and compliance measures related to GDPR and other regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Oferteo S.A.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oferteo
Description
Platforma umożliwiająca dodawanie bezpłatnych ogłoszeń kupię lub zlecę, porównywanie ofert od firm oraz wybór najlepszej. Obsługuje zlecenia i zamówienia dla firm, instytucji i osób prywatnych.
Key services
Dodawanie ogłoszeń, Porównywanie ofert firm, Kategoria usług budowlanych, finansowych, ubezpieczeniowych, prawnych i innych
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, TrustCommander, IntersectionObserver API, WebSockets
Frameworks
Tailwind CSS
Platforms
Web, Mobile (Android, iOS apps)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper input types
  • Use of CSP and other headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Google Tag Manager
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics 4, Bing Ads, TrustCommander
Marketing tools
TrustCommander
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is in Polish and targets Polish market
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. Multiple forms for service search and user interaction
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security flaws in HTML
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to privacy protection or registry policy
  8. Social media and app store presence enhance trust
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response info published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern front-end technologies including JavaScript and Tailwind CSS, ensuring responsive and performant user experience across devices. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics 4, Bing Ads, and TrustCommander for tracking and advertising purposes. The use of IntersectionObserver API and WebSockets indicates advanced client-side interactivity. The site is well-optimized for SEO with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility features like skip links and focus outlines are implemented. Hosting details are not explicitly found, but the site uses CDN services for static assets. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports scalability, security, and user engagement effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oferteo.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oferteo.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.