Skip to main content

Security report for oeproduct.com

Ovostar Union · Manufacturing · Ukraine

Partial score · DNS & email only

49/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ovostar Union operates as a leading manufacturer and exporter of egg products based in Ukraine, positioning itself among the top five egg producers in Europe. The company specializes in liquid eggs, egg powders, and fresh chicken eggs, serving a global market including Europe, Middle East, Asia, and Africa. Their website reflects a professional digital presence with clear product categorization and export information, targeting food industry leaders and importers. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries and Google analytics tools, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and Content-Security-Policy headers, though additional security headers and explicit privacy policies are recommended. Overall, the website demonstrates a credible and trustworthy business with room for improvement in privacy compliance and accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oeproduct.com

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
88
Average
58
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ovostar Union's market position as a top-5 egg producer in Europe is supported by their extensive export network to over 50 countries and certifications such as ISO 9001:2015 and FSSC 22000. Their business model focuses on manufacturing and exporting high-quality egg products, leveraging modern poultry farming and processing technologies. The company targets both Ukrainian and international food industry leaders, emphasizing quality and safety standards compliant with EU regulations. The website's content and certifications reinforce their competitive advantage and trustworthiness in the food manufacturing sector. Strategic partnerships and a corporate parent site indicate a well-established business ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of CSRF tokens in forms, and a Content-Security-Policy header. The presence of Google reCAPTCHA indicates measures against automated abuse. However, the absence of additional security headers like X-Frame-Options and Strict-Transport-Security suggests opportunities for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The lack of explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is a gap in security transparency. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be strengthened to align with best practices and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Add a dedicated vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve security transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards, improving usability for all users.
  5. Incorporate structured data (JSON-LD) for better SEO and richer search engine results.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ovostar Union
Description
Producer of powdered and liquid egg products in Ukraine, exporting to EU, MENA, Asia. Leading volume processor of liquid egg products.
Key services
Liquid eggs pasteurized, Egg powder, Chicken eggs, Export services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Owl Carousel, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, YouTube Widget API, reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content-Security-Policy header present
  • CSRF tokens in forms
  • Use of reCAPTCHA

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection.
  3. Site uses HTTPS with good security headers but could improve with additional headers.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  5. Contact information is present with phone and contact forms but no direct emails.
  6. Social media links are present but URLs are placeholders (#).
  7. Certifications are prominently displayed, enhancing trust.
  8. Site uses modern JS libraries and Google analytics tools.
  9. Content is relevant and well-structured for the target audience.
  10. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Owl Carousel for sliders, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager for tracking. It loads asynchronously and supports mobile responsiveness with a clear navigation structure. The HTML and CSS are valid with proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses CSRF tokens and reCAPTCHA for form security. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and functional user experience with opportunities for further modernization and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oeproduct.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oeproduct.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.