Skip to main content

Security report for oddsbettingsites.com

Odds Betting Sites · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Odds Betting Sites is a niche sports betting odds comparison platform founded in 2020. It provides users with up-to-date odds and bookmaker comparisons for various sports including football, horse racing, and tennis. The website targets sports bettors seeking to maximize value by comparing odds and bonuses across bookmakers. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Cookie Law Info and uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS but does not use DNSSEC. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, with a clean design and clear navigation. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections, but lacks security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial with a cookie consent mechanism but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. No direct contact information or incident response contacts are provided. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in security and compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oddsbettingsites.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as an affiliate/comparison platform in the sports betting sector, focusing on odds and bookmaker comparisons. Its competitive advantage lies in providing timely and comprehensive odds data and bonus comparisons to punters. The business model likely relies on affiliate commissions from bookmakers. The target audience is sports bettors primarily interested in football and other major sports. The company appears small and independent with no parent or subsidiaries identified. The partnership ecosystem includes links to gambling awareness organizations but no direct partner domains. Growth indicators are limited but the site shows consistent content updates and technical maintenance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain registration protections but lacks advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency. The cookie consent mechanism indicates some GDPR awareness but absence of a privacy policy and terms of service is a compliance gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall security maturity is moderate but could be improved by implementing security headers, publishing policies, and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Odds Betting Sites
Description
Odds Betting Sites is a platform that provides comparison of betting odds and sites for sports such as soccer, horse racing, tennis, and handball. It offers up-to-date odds information, bookmaker comparisons, and bonus details to help punters maximize their betting value.
Key services
betting odds comparison, bookmaker site comparison, bonus offers comparison, latest betting news and articles
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS, Chart.js, Cookie Law Info plugin, W3 Total Cache
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on sports betting odds comparison and related news.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and GDPR oriented.
  5. No direct contact information such as emails or phone numbers found.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Analytics.
  7. No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  8. Domain registration is recent but consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Chart.js, and Google Analytics. It uses Cloudflare DNS but does not enable DNSSEC. Performance is moderate with caching plugins like W3 Total Cache. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data. Accessibility is basic but present. There is some technical debt in missing security headers and incomplete privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oddsbettingsites.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oddsbettingsites.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.