The website oconnellretail.com is minimalistic and functions primarily as a frameset redirecting users to an external domain (www.oconnellretail.ie). There is no substantive content, metadata, or business information directly on the site. The lack of HTTPS and absence of privacy or cookie policies indicate a low level of digital maturity and security posture. No contact details or social media presence are evident, which limits user trust and engagement. Technically, the site does not employ modern web standards or frameworks and lacks accessibility and SEO optimizations. Security measures are minimal, with no security headers or incident response information available. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile due to limited content but also offers minimal business credibility or user assurance.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
No HTTPS encryption
GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data
What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
43
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention oconnellretail.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for oconnellretail.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Due to the absence of business information on the site, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The site appears to serve as a redirect or placeholder rather than a full business portal. No indications of market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships are visible. The target audience and business model cannot be determined from the provided content.
Security posture
The security posture of the website is weak. The site lacks HTTPS, security headers, and any visible security or privacy policies. There are no forms or inputs, reducing attack surface, but the absence of encryption and security best practices is a concern. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The site does not demonstrate compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations.
Recommendations
Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
Provide clear contact information and business details to improve credibility.
Enhance website content with modern HTML5 standards, accessibility features, and SEO optimizations.
Introduce security headers and consider a vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security posture.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent
Technology
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor
Security
Observed score
30/100
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low
Key observations
Website content is minimal and consists solely of a frameset redirecting to an external URL.
No metadata such as Open Graph tags or JSON-LD structured data found.
No forms, scripts, or interactive elements detected.
No contact information, emails, phone numbers, or social media links present.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
Website uses a frameset with a single frame pointing to http://www.oconnellretail.ie/.
No visible business information or branding beyond the page title.
No analytics or advertising technologies detected.
Website lacks modern web standards and accessibility features.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses an outdated frameset HTML structure with a single frame pointing to an external domain. No modern technologies, scripts, or CMS platforms are detected. The site lacks meta tags, structured data, and responsive design elements. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content but user experience is poor due to lack of navigation and content. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the provided data.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with oconnellretail.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oconnellretail.com.