Skip to main content

Security report for oci.eu

OCI · Technology · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OCI is a French company specializing in digital transformation and IT services for businesses including SMEs, mid-sized companies, associations, and local authorities. Their website presents a comprehensive portfolio of services such as infrastructure, cybersecurity, cloud services, IT equipment, telephony, physical security, managed IT services, and business software solutions. The company positions itself as a trusted partner for digitalization in France. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and optimized with WP Rocket, featuring modern web technologies and good SEO practices. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, though the website content and design indicate a professional and legitimate business. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oci.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OCI operates in the technology sector focusing on digital transformation services for a diverse client base including SMEs, ETIs, associations, and public entities. Their business model revolves around providing IT infrastructure, cybersecurity, cloud, telephony, and business software solutions. The company leverages partnerships and a broad service portfolio to maintain a competitive position in the French market. The website's structured data and clear service descriptions support their market positioning. No direct information on revenue or subsidiaries was found. The company targets professional clients seeking comprehensive IT modernization and digitalization support.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism via Axeptio, indicating awareness of privacy compliance. However, no explicit security headers such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended for enhanced security. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, nor a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. The lack of WHOIS data reduces trust in domain registration transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the content. Overall, the security posture is moderate with opportunities to strengthen transparency and technical defenses.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact details to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
  4. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Obtain and maintain accurate WHOIS registration data to improve domain trustworthiness and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OCI
Description
Plongez dans la transformation digitale avec OCI. PME, ETI, associations ou collectivités, nos experts en digitalisation vous accompagnent !
Key services
Infrastructure, Cybersécurité, Réseaux, Services Cloud, Équipement IT, Téléphonie & télécoms, Sécurité physique, Espaces connectés, Services IT managés, Administratif & financier
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, WP Rocket, jQuery, Leaflet, Mapbox GL, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Axeptio (cookie consent)
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Axeptio cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust assessment.
  3. Cookie consent implemented via Axeptio.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage content.
  5. Contact phone number and contact page link clearly provided in header.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor page builder and optimized using WP Rocket for performance. It uses modern libraries such as jQuery, Leaflet for maps, Mapbox GL, and Font Awesome icons. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is enhanced by lazy loading scripts and images. No hosting provider information was identified from the content. The technical implementation is modern and well-structured, supporting a positive user experience and efficient content delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oci.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oci.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.