Skip to main content

Security report for ochranaobyvatel.cz

Centrum pro bezpečný stát z.s. · Government · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Centrum pro bezpečný stát z.s. operates a Czech-language website focused on civil protection, emergency preparedness, and educational resources including a 3D learning platform and simulators. The organization targets the general public and municipalities, providing valuable information and training tools to enhance safety during extraordinary events. The website is positioned as a niche non-profit entity with a long-standing presence since 2007, supported by partnerships with related organizations. Technically, the site uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, and other JavaScript libraries to deliver a responsive and interactive user experience, though some libraries are outdated. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism implemented, but lacks visible advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with no explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content. Overall, the website is functional, informative, and trustworthy but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ochranaobyvatel.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization serves a specialized market segment within government and non-profit sectors, focusing on safety education and crisis management. Its business model revolves around providing free or publicly accessible educational content and tools, supported by partnerships with other safety and municipal organizations. The website's longevity and domain age indicate stability and credibility. The presence of external links to government portals and related partners suggests a well-integrated ecosystem. However, the lack of explicit contact information and formal policies may limit user trust and engagement. Growth opportunities include expanding digital presence, enhancing privacy and security transparency, and formalizing incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent banner that complies with GDPR principles. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of older JavaScript libraries may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could hinder timely mitigation of security issues. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML, which is positive. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and protection standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest stable versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  4. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for user support and incident reporting.
  5. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response plan to enhance security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Centrum pro bezpečný stát z.s.
Description
Web focused on protection of citizens during emergencies, offering educational platforms like 3DLearning and 3D simulators for extraordinary events.
Key services
Educational platform 3DLearning, 3D simulator for emergency scenarios, Information on crisis management and citizen protection
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, Shadowbox.js, Owl Carousel, jQuery Validation Engine, jQuery Cookie plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ShareThis
Marketing tools
ShareThis social sharing buttons
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit educational platform focused on civil protection and emergency preparedness.
  2. Content is in Czech language with some English navigation option.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed user controls.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Uses multiple external libraries and social sharing tools.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security policies published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain age of over 18 years, consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and Bootstrap 4.4.1, supplemented by plugins like Shadowbox and Owl Carousel for UI enhancements. The site is hosted by Active24, a known hosting provider. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility considerations, though these are basic. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph image but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. The cookie consent implementation is modern and user-friendly. Technical debt is present due to older library versions and missing security headers. Modernization opportunities include upgrading libraries, implementing advanced security controls, and enhancing SEO with structured data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ochranaobyvatel.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ochranaobyvatel.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.