Office of the Comptroller of the Currency · Government · United States
Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is a U.S. federal government agency responsible for ensuring a safe, sound, and fair federal banking system. The website serves as the official digital presence of the OCC, providing regulatory information, news, publications, and tools for bankers, consumers, and other stakeholders. It holds a strong market position as a key regulator within the U.S. banking sector, operating under the Department of the Treasury. The site targets a broad audience including banking professionals, federal institutions, and the general public seeking regulatory guidance and banking information. Technically, the website is built on the Percussion Content Management System and leverages modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, Crazy Egg, and the U.S. Web Design System (USWDS) to ensure accessibility, responsiveness, and usability. The site demonstrates good performance and SEO practices, with comprehensive metadata and structured navigation. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs domain transfer protections, indicating a secure baseline. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a minor security gap. The presence of a vulnerability disclosure policy is a positive indicator of security awareness, though explicit incident response contacts and security headers are not evident. Privacy compliance is moderate, with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacking a cookie consent mechanism despite the use of tracking scripts. Overall, the OCC website is a professional, trustworthy, and authoritative government resource with strong content quality and business credibility. Minor improvements in security headers, DNSSEC implementation, and privacy consent mechanisms would enhance its security posture and compliance. The site is safe for general audiences and aligns well with its role as a federal regulatory agency.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention occ.gov, from OffSeq Breach.
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for occ.gov.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with occ.gov. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review occ.gov.