The website www.obst-und-garten.de is a professional German-language specialized magazine focused on fruit cultivation and gardening in the Baden-Württemberg region. It is published by Verlag Eugen Ulmer, a recognized publishing entity. The site offers rich content including news, gardening tips, a garden calendar, and subscription services. The technical infrastructure employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, AlpineJS, and Glide.js, alongside analytics tools like Matomo and Google Tag Manager, with cookie consent managed by Klaro. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and consent-based tracking, but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or terms policies. No signs of adult or questionable content are present, making it safe for general audiences.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
70
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention obst-und-garten.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for obst-und-garten.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The business operates as a regional specialized magazine serving gardening enthusiasts, professional self-suppliers, and orchard managers. Its market position is that of a trusted regional publication with a focus on practical and environmental gardening advice. Revenue streams likely include subscriptions, advertising via AdSpirit, and sales of special issues or related products. The target audience is broad within the gardening community, including associations and clubs. The company leverages digital tools for content delivery and user engagement but could improve transparency with published privacy and security policies. Partnership with abo.ulmer.de indicates integrated subscription management.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place to comply with GDPR. Tracking scripts respect consent requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a gap in security culture and readiness. Forms are secured via POST but lack visible anti-CSRF tokens or advanced protections. Overall, the site is secure for typical use but could benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.
Recommendations
Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
Implement and configure security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to enhance security culture and readiness.
Consider adding visible contact information such as company phone numbers and emails to improve user support and credibility.
Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities and maintain privacy compliance.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Verlag Eugen Ulmer
Description
Die Vermittlung praxisorientierter, leicht nachzuvollziehender Ratschläge für alle Gartenarbeiten mit Berücksichtigung des Obstbaus. Nachrichten aus Verband und Vereinen
Key services
Publishing articles on gardening and fruit cultivation, Providing news from associations and clubs, Offering subscription and test subscription, Newsletter distribution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, AlpineJS 3.10.2, Glide.js 3.5.2, Font Awesome, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaro Cookie Consent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
Cookie consent with Klaro
Matomo tracking with cookie consent requirement
No exposed sensitive data in forms or HTML
Analytics and tracking
Services
Matomo, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Ad networks
AdSpirit
Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is a professional German gardening magazine focused on fruit and garden topics in Baden-Württemberg.
Content is rich with articles, news, and gardening tips.
Uses modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries for UI and analytics.
Cookie consent is implemented with Klaro.
No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content.
No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; login form present for subscribers.
Advertising is present via AdSpirit network.
No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a custom CMS with .dll endpoints, modern JavaScript libraries (jQuery, AlpineJS, Glide.js), and Font Awesome for icons. Analytics are handled via Matomo and Google Tag Manager with consent management by Klaro. The site is responsive and accessible, with good SEO meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting details are minimal but DNS uses routing.net name servers. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and lazy image loading. There is room for improvement in security headers and formal documentation of privacy and security policies.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with obst-und-garten.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review obst-und-garten.de.