Skip to main content

Security report for obsadvisory.com

OBS Advisory · Other · N/a

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OBS Advisory is a niche insurance provider specializing in crisis response insurance products including coverage for violent crimes, kidnapping, wrongful detention, and related high-risk scenarios. The company targets individuals and groups requiring specialized insurance solutions for crisis events. The website is currently under development, presenting a placeholder page with minimal content and basic branding elements. The technical infrastructure uses modern front-end technologies such as Bootstrap and Font Awesome, hosted on Rackspace servers, but lacks advanced features or content maturity. Security posture is minimal with no visible security headers, no DNSSEC, and no privacy or cookie policies, indicating early-stage digital maturity. The domain registration is consistent and stable, supporting the legitimacy of the business. Overall, the website requires significant development to improve content richness, security, compliance, and user engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching obsadvisory.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OBS Advisory operates in a specialized insurance market focusing on crisis and kidnap insurance. The business model centers on providing insurance products for high-risk scenarios, targeting a niche audience. The company was founded in 2016, consistent with the domain age. The website currently lacks detailed business information, certifications, or trust signals, limiting its competitive positioning online. Social media presence on Twitter and LinkedIn suggests some level of marketing and outreach. The absence of analytics and tracking indicates limited digital marketing maturity. There are no detected partnerships or subsidiaries linked via the website. The company should focus on expanding online presence, adding comprehensive business information, and improving digital marketing capabilities.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. It lacks essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and DNSSEC is not enabled for the domain. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or SSL/TLS configuration details, though the domain likely supports HTTPS given modern standards. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, and no security contact channels are provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No forms or input fields are present, reducing immediate risk of input-based vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires enhancements to meet industry best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and integrity.
  2. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish security policies including incident response and vulnerability disclosure information with dedicated contact channels.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OBS Advisory
Description
Crisis response insurance for violent crimes, wrongful detention, mysterious disappearance, kidnapping, blackmail, extortion, political threats, hijacking, and acts of terrorism.
Key services
crisis response insurance, kidnap insurance, group crisis response, travel alerts and updates
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.1.0, Font Awesome 5.15.3, Google Fonts (Roboto)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is currently under development with a 'Coming Soon' placeholder page.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to email and social media links only.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  5. No security or incident response policies disclosed.
  6. Minimal content limits SEO and user engagement potential.
  7. Technical stack is modern but minimal.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations.
  10. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business age.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including Bootstrap 5.1.0 and Font Awesome 5.15.3, with Google Fonts for typography. Hosting is provided by Rackspace as indicated by the nameservers. The site is currently a placeholder with minimal content and no CMS detected. Performance is expected to be moderate given the lightweight content. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal due to lack of content and metadata beyond basic meta description and keywords. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating limited data collection and user behavior analysis. The site would benefit from content expansion, SEO improvements, and enhanced technical configurations to improve user experience and search visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with obsadvisory.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review obsadvisory.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.