Skip to main content

Security report for obituaries.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.legacy.com is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Turnstile human verification challenge page, preventing access to actual content and business information. Legacy.com is known in the market as a provider of obituary and memorial services, but this analysis cannot confirm current content or services due to the access block. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare security services, indicating a focus on protecting the site from automated threats. However, the lack of accessible metadata, contact information, and policies limits the ability to assess privacy compliance and security posture fully. The domain WHOIS data is not publicly available, suggesting privacy protection which is common for sites handling sensitive personal data. Overall, the site’s security posture appears cautious but cannot be fully evaluated. The risk assessment is moderate due to the inability to verify content and policies, and strategic recommendations include enabling access for full analysis and improving transparency of security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching obituaries.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Legacy.com operates in the obituary and memorial services sector, serving a broad audience seeking to publish and view obituaries. The business model likely involves partnerships with newspapers and direct consumer services. The domain’s lack of publicly available WHOIS data and the presence of Cloudflare protection suggest a mature approach to security and privacy. However, the absence of visible business contact details and policies in the accessible content limits trust signals. The company likely has a significant market presence given the domain name and reputation, but this cannot be confirmed from the current data. No related or partner domains were identified from the provided content.

Security posture

The security posture is characterized by the use of Cloudflare’s Turnstile captcha, indicating protection against automated attacks and bots. No security headers or SSL configuration details were available for review. The lack of visible privacy and cookie policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests gaps in transparency. The domain’s WHOIS privacy protection is appropriate given the sensitive nature of the business. Overall, the security maturity appears moderate but cannot be fully assessed due to blocked content.

Recommendations

  1. Enable full website access by adjusting WAF settings or providing alternative verification to allow content and policy review.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Provide visible contact information including security incident response contacts to enhance transparency.
  4. Implement and expose security headers and SSL/TLS configuration details to demonstrate best practices.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Page is a Cloudflare security challenge page with Turnstile captcha verifying human visitor before access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile Captcha

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to Cloudflare Turnstile human verification challenge
  2. No visible metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data in the provided HTML
  3. No forms or input fields other than hidden captcha response inputs
  4. No contact information, privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found in the provided content
  5. Only external link found is to Cloudflare domain for security challenge scripts
  6. No email addresses, phone numbers, or social media links detected
  7. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data
  8. Website likely uses Cloudflare as hosting and security provider
  9. Content safety is rated safe based on domain reputation and lack of explicit content
  10. AI scoring limited due to blocked content and lack of accessible data
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare as a hosting and security provider, including the Turnstile captcha for bot mitigation. No CMS or other frameworks were detectable from the provided HTML. The page is minimal and serves only as a security checkpoint, limiting assessment of performance, SEO, accessibility, or mobile optimization. The technical stack is modern in terms of security but lacks visible implementation details. There is an opportunity to improve technical transparency and user experience by reducing access friction and providing richer metadata.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with obituaries.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review obituaries.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.