Skip to main content

Security report for oberndorfer.at

FRANZ OBERNDORFER GmbH & Co KG · Manufacturing · Austria

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

32/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FRANZ OBERNDORFER GmbH & Co KG is Austria's largest precast concrete manufacturer with over 100 years of experience in planning, development, and production of concrete elements. The company holds a leading market position in Austria, offering a comprehensive product portfolio and full-service solutions including logistics and assembly. Their website reflects a mature digital presence built on Drupal 9, with good content quality and clear navigation targeting B2B customers in construction and real estate sectors. However, the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate and HTTPS support is a critical security gap that undermines user trust and data protection. While cookie compliance and privacy policies are well implemented, the lack of explicit security policies and incident response information indicates room for improvement in security governance. Overall, the business is credible and professional, but urgent action is needed to secure the website infrastructure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oberndorfer.at

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
32

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector specializing in precast concrete, serving primarily construction firms and project developers. Their business model focuses on B2B sales with value-added services such as logistics and on-site assembly. The firm leverages its century-long heritage and market leadership in Austria to maintain competitive advantage. The website's integration of social media channels and career opportunities suggests active engagement with stakeholders and talent acquisition. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found in the domain or website data. The company appears stable and well-established with a strong brand presence in its niche.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the lack of HTTPS and SSL/TLS encryption, exposing users to potential interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. Security headers are partially implemented but insufficient to mitigate modern web threats fully. No advanced security frameworks or incident response contacts are published, and no vulnerability disclosure policy exists. The site does not use modern TLS protocols or security enhancements like HSTS or OCSP stapling. These deficiencies pose significant risks to data confidentiality and integrity, especially for a business handling client and employee data. Immediate remediation is recommended to install valid certificates and enhance security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Install and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and 1.3) and disable insecure legacy protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  6. Regularly audit and update all software components, including Drupal and server modules, to patch vulnerabilities.
  7. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience.
  8. Consider integrating analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user behavior.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FRANZ OBERNDORFER GmbH & Co KG
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 9 CMS running on an Apache web server. The front-end uses standard HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript with lazy loading for images and a cookie compliance script. The site is well structured with semantic markup and meta tags supporting SEO and social sharing (Open Graph). However, the lack of HTTPS and modern TLS support is a major technical deficiency. Performance metrics are unavailable, but the site uses caching headers and Drupal's dynamic cache mechanisms. Mobile optimization appears good with responsive design and viewport settings. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but the IP address suggests a dedicated or VPS environment. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires urgent security upgrades.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oberndorfer.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oberndorfer.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.