Skip to main content

Security report for obelisk.lv

SIA "OB Birojs" · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Obelisk is a small Latvian funeral service provider operating primarily in Riga and surrounding regions, offering comprehensive funeral and cremation services including transportation, preparation, and organization. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and detailed service descriptions, targeting individuals and families in need of ritual services. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Tag Manager, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form validation, though lacking some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, enhancing user trust. Overall, the website presents a credible and trustworthy business presence with room for improvement in security best practices and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching obelisk.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a local full-service funeral bureau with 24/7 availability, emphasizing personalized service and attention to detail. Its business model revolves around providing ritual services, including transportation of the deceased, preparation for burial or cremation, and related accessories. The clear pricing packages and physical office location support transparency and customer confidence. The presence of social media engagement via Facebook indicates active customer outreach. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification but the business content aligns with a legitimate local service provider.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and secure form validation, reducing risks of data interception and injection attacks. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a missed opportunity to enhance protection against clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be improved to demonstrate security maturity. The use of third-party analytics scripts requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from additional hardening and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy or incident response contact to improve transparency and readiness for security incidents.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Consider adding terms of service and vulnerability disclosure pages to increase user trust and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "OB Birojs"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "OB Birojs"
Description
Pilna servisa apbedīšanas birojs Rīgā piedāvā diennakts bēru organizēšanas pakalpojumus un atbalstu. Strādājam Rīgā, Rīgas rajonā, Jūrmalā.
Key services
Funeral organization, Cremation services, Transportation of deceased, Preparation of deceased, Funeral accessories
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery (commented out), HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
RD Navbar
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Secure contact form with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Clear contact information and physical address provided.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  8. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available.
  9. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern HTML5 and CSS3 codebase with responsive design and Google Fonts integration. It leverages Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for traffic and conversion tracking. The navigation is built on the RD Navbar framework, providing a consistent user experience. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, though some scripts like jQuery are commented out, indicating possible legacy code. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with obelisk.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review obelisk.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.