Skip to main content

Security report for obecotovice.cz

Obec Otovice · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Obec Otovice operates an official municipal website serving the local community in the Czech Republic. The site provides comprehensive information about the municipality, including news updates, administrative office details, public notices, and community services. It targets residents and visitors seeking official information and local resources. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, reflecting a small government entity's digital presence. Technically, the website employs a modern but straightforward technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper for UI components. It is likely powered by the Galileo CMS platform, as indicated by footer references. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility features, although some improvements could be made. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, no advanced security headers or explicit security policies are present, and no incident response contacts are provided. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a concern but does not detract significantly from the site's legitimacy given the official nature and content consistency. Overall, Obec Otovice's website is a trustworthy and functional municipal portal with good content quality and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and WHOIS data visibility would enhance trust and security posture further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching obecotovice.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Obec Otovice holds a stable position as a local government entity providing essential public services and information to its community. Its business model is non-commercial, focusing on transparency, communication, and civic engagement. The website supports community awareness through news, event announcements, and administrative resources. Partnerships with regional government sites and local service providers strengthen its ecosystem. The absence of commercial advertising and tracking reflects a public service orientation. Growth indicators include regular content updates and digital engagement via mobile apps and smart info notifications. The site’s operational focus is on reliability and accessibility rather than revenue generation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. The presence of a cookie consent script aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a missed opportunity to harden the site against common web attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Overall, the site is secure for typical municipal use but could benefit from enhanced security controls and documentation to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain registration trust and legitimacy.
  4. Regularly update all third-party libraries and frameworks to their latest secure versions.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Obec Otovice
Description
Oficiální stránky Obce Otovice providing information about the municipality, local news, administrative office details, and community services.
Key services
Municipal information, News and updates, Contact details, Public notices and official documents, Community events and services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, Swiper 4.5.0, jQuery Mmenu 7.0.6, Highslide JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Czech language and targeted at local residents and visitors.
  3. No social media links detected.
  4. No forms collecting personal data except a search form with a single text input.
  5. No explicit security.txt or incident response contact found.
  6. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  7. No visible advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  8. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern but does not necessarily indicate malicious intent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, Swiper 4.5.0, and jQuery Mmenu 7.0.6 for responsive UI and navigation. Highslide JS is used for image interactions. The CMS appears to be Galileo Corporation’s platform, as indicated by footer branding. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs such as Cloudflare and StackPath. Performance is moderate with no critical bottlenecks detected. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and mobile-friendly navigation menus. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, no advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries (e.g., React, Angular) are used, indicating a traditional web architecture. There is room for modernization and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with obecotovice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review obecotovice.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.