Skip to main content

Security report for obecnirozhlas.cz

SOVT-Radio spol. s r.o. · Telecommunications · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SOVT-Radio spol. s r.o. is a Czech telecommunications company specializing in wireless local information systems and radiocommunication technology. Established in 1992 with roots dating back to 1986, the company manufactures advanced digital public address systems such as RDRdigi3 and VARIS4. Their market position is that of an experienced and trusted provider with the longest experience in wireless public address systems in their region. The company targets municipalities and public safety organizations, offering comprehensive services from design to installation and maintenance. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and several common plugins including Contact Form 7 and Slider Revolution. The site is moderately performant, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly with structured data markup. Hosting is likely local to the Czech Republic, registered with REG-INTERNET-CZ. Analytics are implemented via MonsterInsights but not fully configured. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks explicit security headers and does not provide incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR. Contact information is clearly presented, and the company holds ISO 9001 certification, which is a positive trust indicator. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, improved security headers, and explicit incident response details to strengthen its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of obecnirozhlas.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching obecnirozhlas.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the telecommunications sector with a focus on wireless public address and local information systems. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing experience and comprehensive service offering, including custom system design, simulation, and full lifecycle support. The business model combines manufacturing with service provision, targeting public sector clients such as municipalities and emergency services. Growth is supported by participation in regional cooperation programs and academic partnerships. The website reflects a stable, small-sized enterprise with consistent branding and clear market positioning in the Czech Republic.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS, which is mandatory, but lacks several security best practices such as security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.) and incident response contact information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. The use of common WordPress plugins suggests a standard security baseline but requires ongoing maintenance to avoid vulnerabilities. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, which could impact trust and rapid mitigation of security issues.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publish incident response contact information and consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Complete configuration of Google Analytics plugin or remove if not used to avoid unnecessary data collection.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SOVT-Radio spol. s r.o.
Description
SOVT-Radio spol. s r.o. specializes in wireless local information systems (BMIS) and radiocommunication technology with a history dating back to 1986. They manufacture systems such as RDRdigi3 and VARIS4 and offer comprehensive services including design, simulation, installation, and servicing of wireless public address systems.
Key services
wireless local information systems, digital public address systems, technical and economic studies, installation and servicing, custom system design and simulation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Slider Revolution, Contact Form 7, Google Fonts, FontAwesome
Frameworks
Avada Theme, All in One SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by Contact Form 7 and other plugins)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with company emails and phone numbers.
  4. Website uses WordPress with a commercial theme and common plugins.
  5. Google Analytics plugin is installed but not fully configured.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. Business information is consistent and well presented.
  8. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available.
  9. Content is professional and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress platform using the Avada theme and several popular plugins, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure. The use of Google Fonts, FontAwesome, and jQuery libraries is typical for modern websites. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers. Hosting appears stable and regionally appropriate. Technical debt is minimal but could be reduced by removing unused or misconfigured plugins and improving security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 53/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with obecnirozhlas.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review obecnirozhlas.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.