Skip to main content

Security report for obeckrenovice.cz

Obec Křenovice · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Obec Křenovice operates an official municipal website serving the local community in the Czech Republic. The site provides essential information about the village, local government activities, public notices, cultural events, and contact details. It targets residents and visitors seeking official municipal information. The business model is a government information portal with a focus on transparency and community engagement. Technically, the website uses a mix of older and modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and various UI libraries, managed via a proprietary CMS (WRS by W Partner s.r.o.). The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy in place, indicating compliance with GDPR requirements. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is presumably enabled, no advanced security headers or incident response policies are evident. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, but the presence of official contact information and government links supports legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could benefit from technical and security improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching obeckrenovice.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Obec Křenovice as a small local government entity providing essential services and information to its community. Its competitive advantage lies in official status and direct communication channels. The business model is informational and service-oriented, with no commercial revenue streams. The target audience includes local residents, government officials, and visitors. The site links to regional government portals and social programs, indicating a partnership ecosystem within public administration. Growth indicators are limited due to the nature of the entity. Strategic observations suggest maintaining transparency and improving digital security to enhance trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic to moderate. The website implements cookie consent and privacy policies, showing awareness of data protection regulations. However, the lack of visible security headers, outdated JavaScript libraries, and absence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure information indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Compliance with GDPR is partially demonstrated but could be strengthened with explicit data protection officer contact and security policies. Incident response readiness appears minimal. Overall, the security culture is nascent and would benefit from formalization and technical enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Upgrade JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Ensure SSL/TLS certificates are properly configured and enforced site-wide.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to maintain a strong security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Obec Křenovice
Registration number
00511781
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Obec Křenovice
Description
Official website of the municipality of Křenovice, providing information about the village, local government, news, and public notices.
Key services
Public notices and official documents, Contact information for municipal offices, Cultural and sports event information, Links to regional government and social portals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.3, Bootstrap 4.0.0-alpha.6, jQuery UI 1.11.4, Fancybox 2.1.5, Lightslider, Flexslider, Slicknav, Google Fonts (Courgette, Roboto Slab), TermsFeed Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
TermsFeed Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official municipal site for Křenovice, Czech Republic.
  2. Content is in Czech language and well structured for local residents.
  3. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented.
  5. No evident security headers or advanced security policies found.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. No forms collecting personal data except a search form with CSRF token.
  8. Site uses older versions of jQuery and Bootstrap alpha version, which may have security implications.
  9. No analytics or tracking services detected beyond cookie consent.
  10. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a proprietary CMS (WRS) with a technology stack including jQuery 1.11.3, Bootstrap 4 alpha, Fancybox, Lightslider, Flexslider, and Slicknav. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site loads multiple JavaScript libraries and CSS files locally and from CDNs. Performance is moderate with some legacy components that could be modernized. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are implemented, including keyboard navigation and font size controls. SEO is supported with meta tags and structured navigation. Technical risks include outdated libraries and lack of security headers. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the infrastructure is functional but would benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with obeckrenovice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review obeckrenovice.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.