Skip to main content

Security report for oaza.eu

OAZA - Ochranná Asociace Zvukařů - Autorů · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OAZA is a professional collective management organization founded in 2003, authorized by the Czech Ministry of Culture to protect and manage copyright rights of sound engineers and sound designers. The organization operates as a non-profit entity with a clear mission to support its members through rights administration and collective management. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern plugins and a cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. The site is well-structured, visually consistent, and provides comprehensive information about statutory bodies, partners, documents, and contact details. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in HTTP security headers and explicit security policies. No WHOIS data is publicly available due to EURid privacy policies, but the domain and business information are consistent and trustworthy. Overall, the website demonstrates a professional, credible, and compliant digital footprint suitable for its sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oaza.eu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong market position as a niche collective management entity serving sound engineers in the Czech Republic and internationally through partnerships. Its business model is based on non-profit collective rights management, with revenue likely derived from licensing and rights administration fees. The target audience includes sound professionals and authors. The website lists numerous international partner organizations, indicating a broad cooperative network. The presence of official documents and government authorization enhances credibility. Growth indicators include recent partnerships and updated statutes. The business operates in the 'Other' sector, focusing on intellectual property and creative rights.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism with detailed user controls, indicating awareness of privacy and security compliance. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and no incident response or security policy information is publicly available. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy suggests room for maturity improvement. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The security score is moderate, reflecting good baseline practices but lacking advanced security disclosures and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance SSL/TLS configuration to ensure strong encryption and forward secrecy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ochranná Asociace Zvukařů – Autorů, z.s.
VAT number
CZ 266 30 192
Registration number
266 30 192
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OAZA - Ochranná Asociace Zvukařů - Autorů
Description
Ochranná asociace zvukařů – autorů, zapsaný spolek (OAZA) vznikla v roce 2003 jako profesní organizace, sdružující na principu dobrovolného členství mistry zvuku. The Association of sound engineers has been founded in 2003 as a professional organization associating sound engineers/designers. In 2006 it became Copyright association of sound engineers (OAZA) and it has been issued an authorization by the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic. OAZA conducts collective management and protects and manages rights of sound engineers/sound designers as a collective management organization.
Key services
Collective management of copyright for sound engineers, Rights protection and administration, Partnerships with international and national organizations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, Google Fonts, Font Awesome, Google Maps API, CookieYes Consent Management
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories and user controls

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly due to EURid privacy policy
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories and user controls
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address
  5. Multiple official documents are published and downloadable
  6. Strong branding and consistent visual identity
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  9. No analytics scripts detected except cookie consent
  10. Multiple international partnerships and memberships listed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, and Google Maps API. SEO is enhanced with Yoast SEO plugin. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs and uses a cookie consent tool (CookieYes) for GDPR compliance. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site structure is clear with well-organized navigation and content sections. There is no evidence of hosting provider or server details in the provided data. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oaza.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oaza.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.