Skip to main content

Security report for nzventures.se

NZ Ventures · Other · Sweden

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NZ Ventures is a Swedish consulting company specializing in change management, concept development, and operational support to optimize business processes and foster sustainable growth. The company positions itself as a creative and innovative partner for organizations seeking to break old patterns and embrace new ideas for success. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging Nuxt.js and Vue.js frameworks, with integrations such as Google Tag Manager and Google Maps API to enhance user experience and analytics capabilities. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and Google reCAPTCHA on contact forms, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are absent, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security posture. The lack of WHOIS data for the exact domain queried raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be verified to ensure trustworthiness. Overall, the website is well-designed, content-rich, and user-friendly, targeting organizations in Sweden looking for business development and innovation consulting services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nzventures.se

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NZ Ventures operates in the consulting sector with a focus on innovation and business transformation. Their market positioning emphasizes creativity and strategic expertise, appealing to organizations aiming for growth and operational excellence. The business model revolves around providing tailored consulting services including operational support, change management, business development, and concept creation. The company targets primarily Swedish organizations, as indicated by the language and contact details. The website demonstrates a consistent branding strategy and professional content, supporting credibility. Partnerships appear limited to the hosting and CDN provider Brucy.io. The absence of privacy and cookie policies may impact compliance with GDPR and other regulations, which is critical for consulting firms handling client data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect contact forms from spam and abuse, reflecting a baseline security posture. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests potential vulnerabilities to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and other web attacks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant red flag that could indicate registration issues or misconfiguration. Overall, while the site shows some security best practices, it lacks comprehensive measures and documentation necessary for a mature security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data handling.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Verify domain registration status and WHOIS information to resolve inconsistencies and improve trustworthiness.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with data protection regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NZ Ventures
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NZ Ventures
Description
NZ Ventures erbjuder förändringsledning, konceptutveckling och operativt stöd för att optimera din verksamhet och skapa hållbara resultat.
Key services
Operativt stöd, Förändringsledning, Affärs- och verksamhetsutveckling, Konceptutveckling
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, Vue.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, reCAPTCHA v2
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vue.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, address, and contact form.
  4. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and good mobile optimization.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. WHOIS data missing for the exact domain queried, which is unusual and requires further investigation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks Nuxt.js and Vue.js, providing a performant and responsive user experience. Hosting and CDN services are provided by Brucy.io, ensuring fast content delivery. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Google Maps API for location services, enhancing functionality. The contact form includes Google reCAPTCHA to prevent spam. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices, including structured data (JSON-LD) for organization information. However, the absence of a CMS or explicit platform is noted, and no server-side security headers were detected in the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nzventures.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nzventures.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.