Skip to main content

Security report for nzm.cz

Národní zemědělské muzeum, s. p. o. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Národní zemědělské muzeum, s. p. o., is a Czech national agricultural museum operating multiple branches across the country. It offers exhibitions, educational programs, cultural events, and venue rentals, targeting a broad audience including the general public, researchers, and schools. The institution is affiliated with the Czech Ministry of Agriculture, reinforcing its official status and cultural importance. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel, with a cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and consent-based tracking, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the website's content and official affiliations support its legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-maintained, user-friendly, and trustworthy for its intended audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nzm.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The museum holds a significant position in the Czech cultural and educational sector, supported by government funding. Its business model focuses on public education, cultural preservation, and event hosting. The website highlights multiple museum locations and a rich calendar of events and exhibitions, indicating active engagement with visitors and stakeholders. Partnerships with media and governmental bodies enhance its reach and credibility. The institution leverages digital tools for outreach, including social media and virtual tours, reflecting a modern approach to audience engagement. Growth opportunities may include expanding digital content and enhancing accessibility features. The museum's ecosystem includes collaborations with the Ministry of Agriculture and media partners, strengthening its market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, and use of reputable analytics and marketing tools with user consent. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. Incident response contact information is not publicly available, which could hinder timely reporting of security issues. Compliance with GDPR is evident through detailed privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site balances user privacy and tracking needs effectively but should enhance header security and incident response transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear incident response and security contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure they remain secure and compliant with privacy regulations.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant certifications or trust badges to further boost business credibility and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Národní zemědělské muzeum, s. p. o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Národní zemědělské muzeum, s. p. o.
Description
Národní zemědělské muzeum is a national agricultural museum in the Czech Republic offering exhibitions, events, educational programs, and rental services across multiple locations.
Key services
Museum exhibitions, Educational programs and workshops, Event hosting and venue rentals, Virtual tours and online content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, KookieCheck cookie consent, Google Fonts (Open Sans)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
KookieCheck cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong cookie consent mechanism with granular user controls
  3. No visible security or privacy policy gaps
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment
  5. Use of multiple social media channels for outreach
  6. Professional design and consistent branding
  7. No signs of adult or inappropriate content
  8. No explicit terms of service found
  9. Multiple museum locations and event listings indicate active institution
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS platform (WebRedakce by NETservis s.r.o.) and uses jQuery 3.2.1 along with Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. It employs Google Tag Manager for tag management and KookieCheck for cookie consent compliance. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses responsive design techniques for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and accessibility. The technical infrastructure supports a rich content experience with virtual tours, event listings, and multiple museum branches. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modern security header adoption and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nzm.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nzm.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.