Skip to main content

Security report for nunetic.com

Technology · United Kingdom

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain nunetic.com currently hosts a placeholder page indicating that the website is no longer available. The page is served by 34SP.com, a UK-based web hosting provider specializing in domain registration and hosting services. No actual business content or services are accessible on the domain, and the page primarily serves as a notification to domain owners and visitors about the site's offline status. The hosting provider's contact email is provided for support inquiries. From a technical perspective, the website is minimal with basic HTML and CSS, lacking any advanced frameworks, CMS, or scripts. There is no evidence of HTTPS or security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. The site is not optimized for SEO or accessibility and offers a poor user experience due to the lack of content and navigation. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and incident response information. No vulnerabilities or malicious content are detected, but the lack of security best practices and policies is notable. The domain's WHOIS data was not provided, limiting trust and legitimacy analysis. Overall, the site is offline and non-functional, resulting in a very low AI score. Strategic recommendations include enabling HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and restoring business content to improve credibility and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  5. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nunetic.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
31

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nunetic.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for nunetic.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a domain that was previously active but is now offline, hosted by 34SP.com, a UK-based hosting provider. The business model of the hosting provider includes domain registration, WordPress hosting, reseller hosting, and shared hosting services. The target audience includes website owners and visitors seeking information about the domain status. There are no indications of the original business's market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships due to the lack of content. The hosting provider's branding is consistent, but no direct business intelligence about nunetic.com is available.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of the website is very low. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes the site to potential risks such as data interception and clickjacking. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Incident response readiness is not demonstrated, and no security contact information is provided. While no active vulnerabilities or malicious indicators are found, the lack of basic security controls and policies is a significant gap. The site should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure communications.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Provide clear contact information for incident response and security inquiries.
  5. Restore business content and improve website design and navigation to enhance user experience and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website was hosted by 34SP.com, a UK based website hosting company offering domain name registration services, WordPress Hosting, Reseller Hosting and shared web hosting services.
Key services
domain name registration, WordPress Hosting, Reseller Hosting, shared web hosting
Content quality
poor
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is offline and displays a domain expired/website no longer available notice.
  2. No actual business content or services are currently accessible on the domain.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. Only contact information is an email address for hosting provider support.
  5. No forms, scripts, or analytics detected.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  7. Site is hosted by 34SP.com, a UK hosting company.
  8. No social media or phone contact information found.
  9. No structured data or metadata beyond basic HTML head tags.
  10. No evidence of WAF or security blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML5 and CSS without any detected CMS or JavaScript frameworks. It is hosted by 34SP.com, a UK hosting provider. The site lacks modern technical features such as responsive design, SEO meta tags, and accessibility enhancements. Performance is moderate given the minimal content, but the absence of HTTPS and security headers represents a technical risk. There is an opportunity to modernize the site by adopting a CMS, improving SEO, and implementing security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nunetic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nunetic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.