Skip to main content

Security report for npvelkafatra.sk

Správa Národného parku Veľká Fatra · Government · Slovakia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Správa Národného parku Veľká Fatra is the official managing body of the Veľká Fatra National Park in Slovakia, providing comprehensive information about the park's nature, tourism, environmental education, and visitor guidelines. The website serves as a government portal targeting tourists, schools, and the general public interested in nature conservation. The site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and includes structured data for SEO and accessibility. It features a cookie consent mechanism and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. Security posture is good with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. Contact information and legal disclaimers are clearly presented, enhancing trust and compliance. Overall, the website is professional, informative, and trustworthy, supporting the park's mission and public engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching npvelkafatra.sk

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions the national park as a key regional government entity focused on nature protection and environmental education. It leverages partnerships with Slovak environmental ministries and agencies, and promotes an e-shop for souvenirs to support conservation efforts. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public service and education. The site content and structure indicate a mature digital presence with clear navigation and relevant content for its audience. The park's market position is stable as a government-managed protected area with a strong local and tourist user base. The partnership ecosystem includes official government bodies and nature protection organizations, reinforcing legitimacy and operational support.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. Use of up-to-date jQuery and WordPress versions reduces vulnerability risks. Cookie consent and privacy policy indicate GDPR awareness. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected and should be implemented to enhance protection. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be improved to support security transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but can be strengthened with additional headers and documented response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Publish explicit incident response and security contact information on the website.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and WordPress core to mitigate emerging vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Správa Národného parku Veľká Fatra so sídlom v Martine
Registration number
54435366
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Správa Národného parku Veľká Fatra
Description
Národný park Veľká Fatra je národný park v severozápadnej časti stredného Slovenska, zriadený v roku 2002 s rozlohou 40 371 ha a ochranným pásmom 26 132 ha. Poskytuje informácie o prírode, turistike, ochrane prírody, environmentálnej výchove a návštevnom poriadku.
Key services
ochrana prírody, environmentálna výchova, správa národného parku, informovanie návštevníkov, predaj suvenírov cez e-shop
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, PHP, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Slider Revolution, Popup Maker, Contact Form 7, Cookie Notice plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by cookie notice and contact form plugins)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Popup Maker
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official Slovak national park site with comprehensive information.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO, analytics, and user interaction.
  3. Good use of structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and webpage metadata.
  4. Includes cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including physical address and email.
  6. No signs of malicious content or security issues in the HTML content.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook is linked.
  8. E-shop for souvenirs is promoted via popup and menu.
  9. Content is in Slovak language targeting local and visiting tourists.
  10. No terms of service page explicitly found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.8.3 with common plugins such as Contact Form 7, Cookie Notice, Popup Maker, and Slider Revolution. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with some scope for optimization. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The technical stack is modern and well maintained, supporting a stable user experience with room for security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with npvelkafatra.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review npvelkafatra.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.