Skip to main content

Security report for npsumava.cz

Národní park Šumava · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Národní park Šumava operates as the official governmental entity managing the Šumava National Park and its protected landscape area in the Czech Republic. The website serves as a comprehensive information portal for visitors, environmental stakeholders, and the general public, offering details on park management, visitor centers, ecological education, events, and related services. It holds a strong market position as the authoritative source for all matters related to the Šumava National Park. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Elementor for page building, WPML for multilingual support, and performance optimizations via WP Rocket. It integrates analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, and OneSignal for push notifications. The site is mobile optimized, accessible, and SEO friendly, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms compliant with EU GDPR regulations. While explicit security headers are not fully confirmed, no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of published security policies or incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance, with a low risk profile. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing security and incident response policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to further strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of npsumava.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching npsumava.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
83
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a government-operated national park authority, focusing on environmental conservation, tourism, and public education. Its business model is non-commercial, centered on public service and information dissemination. The target audience includes tourists, researchers, environmentalists, and local communities. The site leverages partnerships with various Czech environmental and governmental agencies, as evidenced by linked domains. The presence of an e-shop indicates some revenue generation through merchandise sales. The organization maintains a consistent brand and high content quality, supporting its authoritative market position within the Czech Republic's environmental sector.

Security posture

The current security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, reflecting compliance with GDPR. The use of modern, updated libraries reduces vulnerability risks. However, the lack of explicit security headers and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the analyzed content. The site would benefit from formalizing security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure to enhance security culture and stakeholder trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate emerging vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging mechanisms to detect and respond to security incidents promptly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Národní park Šumava
Description
Oficiální webové stránka Národního parku Šumava, který zastřešuje národní park a chráněnou krajinnou oblast​.
Key services
Information on park management, Visitor information and services, Environmental education, Event announcements, E-shop for park-related products
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Elementor, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, OneSignal Push Notifications, WPML (multilingual plugin), Superfly Menu, WP Rocket (performance optimization), Font Awesome
Frameworks
GeneratePress (WordPress theme), Elementor (page builder)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar (mentioned in cookie description)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK, OneSignal
Marketing tools
OneSignal Push Notifications
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is official and authoritative for Šumava National Park.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with multilingual support.
  3. Strong compliance with EU privacy and cookie regulations.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in main HTML; contact likely via contact page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website utilizes a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor for flexible content management and WPML for multilingual capabilities. Performance optimizations are applied via WP Rocket, and analytics/tracking are integrated through Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook SDK. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as an accessibility toolbar. The technology stack is current with no outdated or vulnerable libraries detected. Hosting details are not explicit, but the site uses CDN and external services for fonts and scripts. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust, user-friendly, and compliant web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with npsumava.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review npsumava.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.