Skip to main content

Security report for npolar.no

Norsk Polarinstitutt · Government · Norway

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Norsk Polarinstitutt is a Norwegian government research institute specializing in scientific knowledge and advisory services related to the Arctic and Antarctic regions. The organization operates research programs, logistics, and manages research stations and vessels. The website reflects a mature and established institution with a clear focus on polar science and environmental monitoring. The target audience includes Norwegian authorities, researchers, and the public interested in polar topics. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme, with a moderate level of digital maturity but suffers from slow performance and an invalid SSL certificate, which impacts security and user trust. Security posture is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, although cookie consent and privacy policies are properly implemented, indicating good privacy compliance. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but requires urgent security improvements to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching npolar.no

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institute holds a strong market position as Norway's official polar research body with over 25 years of domain presence. Its business model is government-funded research and advisory services, with key offerings including scientific programs, data dissemination, and infrastructure management. The website demonstrates consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting its role as a trusted information source. Partnerships and data services are indicated by linked domains such as data.npolar.no and app.cristin.no. The presence on social media platforms enhances outreach and engagement. Growth indicators include active news updates and event listings. The lack of phone contact may reflect a preference for digital communication channels.

Security posture

Security maturity is currently low due to critical issues with SSL/TLS configuration. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols expose users to risks and reduce trust. DNS CAA records are malformed, which could affect certificate issuance security. However, the site employs HSTS and has no detected vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policy adherence show awareness of privacy regulations. Incident response and security policy pages are not found, indicating room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Recommendations include immediate SSL certificate renewal, enabling modern TLS versions, and adding security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Renew and properly configure SSL certificate to enable HTTPS securely.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 protocols to ensure secure communications.
  3. Correct CAA DNS records to valid entries to prevent unauthorized certificate issuance.
  4. Implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Publish explicit security policy and incident response information to improve transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with the Enfold theme and uses common web technologies including jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, and Matomo analytics. The site has a large number of resources (134) and a page size of approximately 79 KB but suffers from slow load times (~6.1 seconds). Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are well implemented with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicit but DNS points to hyp.net nameservers. Technical debt is indicated by disabled modern TLS protocols and invalid SSL certificate, which pose operational risks. Modernization opportunities include performance optimization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with npolar.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review npolar.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.