Skip to main content

Security report for nperf.com

nPerf · Telecommunications · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

nPerf operates a professional internet speed testing platform offering broadband and mobile network performance measurements globally. The company provides free web-based speed tests alongside downloadable applications for Android, iOS, and desktop platforms. Their services include detailed analytics, coverage maps, and custom solutions for network optimization. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and supports multiple languages, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks, Matomo analytics, and Facebook Pixel for tracking, hosted likely behind Cloudflare infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and secure form validations, though explicit security headers are missing and no public incident response information is provided. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, impacting domain legitimacy trust. Overall, nPerf presents a credible and professional service with room for improvement in transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 10 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nperf.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

nPerf positions itself as a key player in the telecommunications testing and analytics market, targeting internet users and network operators worldwide. Their business model combines free consumer-facing tools with commercial analytics and custom solutions. The company leverages a broad partner ecosystem including app stores and social media platforms for distribution and marketing. Growth indicators include extensive language support and multiple platform apps. The lack of visible company registration details and WHOIS data suggests a need for enhanced corporate transparency to strengthen trust. Their competitive advantage lies in a comprehensive testing algorithm and a global server network optimized for accurate speed measurement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and secure input validation on forms. Use of Matomo analytics indicates privacy-conscious tracking compared to more invasive services. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure policy is found, limiting incident response readiness. The site does not expose sensitive data in HTML or scripts. Overall, security maturity is moderate with opportunities to enhance compliance with best practices and regulatory requirements such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Improve iframe referrer policies to stricter settings to reduce information leakage.
  4. Verify and publish domain WHOIS registration details to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
nPerf
Description
Test your internet speed and the quality of your DSL, xDSL, cable, optical fiber or satellite broadband connection with our bandwidth and internet speed test.
Key services
Internet speed test (download, upload, latency), Mobile and desktop applications, Coverage and speed maps, Network optimization solutions, Custom web and mobile apps, Hosting servers for testing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Matomo Analytics, Bootstrap, jQuery, Cloudflare Insights
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web, Android, iOS, PC/Mac
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of referrerpolicy="unsafe-url" on iframe (could be improved)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Matomo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional and comprehensive internet speed testing service
  3. Strong multi-language support with many locale options
  4. Use of Matomo analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking
  5. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security flaws in HTML
  6. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trustworthiness score
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  8. Contact available via form but no direct emails or phone numbers found
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response info published
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with JavaScript frameworks, Bootstrap for responsive design, and Matomo for analytics. Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare CDN, enhancing performance and security. The site loads quickly with optimized images and lazy loading. Multi-language support is extensive, improving global accessibility. Forms include client-side validation enhancing user input security. However, the lack of CMS identification suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Technical debt appears low, but adding security headers and improving referrer policies would strengthen the infrastructure. Overall, the technical implementation supports a fast, accessible, and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nperf.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nperf.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.