Skip to main content

Security report for np-recht.de

Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Nolte › ‹ Pustejovsky · Other · Germany

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Nolte › ‹ Pustejovsky is a specialized law firm based in Freiburg, Germany, offering expert legal services in areas such as corporate law, labor law, inheritance law including business succession, family law, data protection, IT law, and intellectual property law. The firm targets both companies and private individuals, positioning itself as a boutique legal service provider with a strong focus on specialized legal fields. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive service descriptions and regular legal updates via their blog and social media channels. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and caching plugins, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. The hosting is managed via kasserver.com, and the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. However, some security best practices such as security headers and incident response disclosures are missing, which could be improved to enhance the security posture. From a security perspective, the site shows no signs of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and security headers are minor gaps in GDPR compliance and security hardening. The WHOIS data aligns well with the website content, showing consistent domain registration and no privacy protection, which supports the legitimacy of the business. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and suitable for its target audience. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security policies would further strengthen its position and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching np-recht.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
33
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The law firm operates in a competitive legal services market, focusing on niche areas such as IT law, data protection, and inheritance law for entrepreneurs, which may provide competitive advantages. Their business model is service-based, targeting both corporate and private clients. The firm maintains a content marketing strategy through regular blog posts and social media engagement, indicating active client communication and thought leadership. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent operation. The firm’s digital presence is professional but could benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to meet evolving regulatory requirements and client expectations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security hardening. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits transparency in security management. GDPR compliance is partially met with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. The absence of tracking and analytics scripts reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a professional legal website but can be improved with standard security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR cookie regulations.
  3. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider integrating privacy-friendly analytics to balance user insights with privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Nolte › ‹ Pustejovsky
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Nolte › ‹ Pustejovsky
Description
Rechtsanwaltskanzlei specializing in Gesellschaftsrecht, Arbeitsrecht, Erbrecht, Vorsorgerecht, Familienrecht, Datenschutzrecht, IT-Recht, gewerblicher Rechtsschutz, and related legal fields. They provide legal advice and representation to companies and private individuals.
Key services
Gesellschaftsrecht, Arbeitsrecht, Erbrecht including Unternehmensnachfolge, Vorsorgerecht, Familienrecht, Datenschutzrecht, IT-Recht, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz, Medien-, Presse- und Urheberrecht, Sportrecht / E-Sport
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.4, Yoast SEO plugin v26.2, jQuery 3.7.1, WP Rocket 3.17.3.1, Fusion Builder, PHP (implied by WordPress), CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern plugins for SEO and caching

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, WP Rocket
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to legal services.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and email.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins for SEO and caching.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the HTML content.
  8. Social media presence limited to Instagram for IT/Media law updates.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  10. No explicit business registration or VAT number found on site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using up-to-date plugins such as Yoast SEO and WP Rocket for SEO and caching optimization. The site loads with moderate speed and is mobile responsive, providing a good user experience across devices. The use of structured data (JSON-LD) enhances SEO and content discoverability. Hosting is provided by kasserver.com, a known hosting provider. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking scripts, which reduces complexity and privacy concerns but limits marketing insights.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with np-recht.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review np-recht.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.