Skip to main content

Security report for nostresscommerce.cz

NoStress Commerce s.r.o. · E-commerce · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Koongo, operated by NoStress Commerce s.r.o., is a mature SaaS platform specializing in product feed management and marketplace integrations for e-commerce sellers. The company offers extensive integrations with over 500 sales channels and supports numerous e-commerce platforms, positioning itself as a comprehensive solution for online sellers seeking to expand their marketplace presence. The website content is professionally designed, rich in detail, and targets online sellers and businesses requiring automated order and inventory synchronization. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, and Intercom, hosted on Forpsi infrastructure. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of TLS protocol support represent critical security weaknesses. While security headers and content security policies are partially implemented, the site’s security posture is significantly impacted by the missing HTTPS, which is a fundamental requirement for secure web operations. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, consent mechanisms, and GDPR alignment. Overall, the site demonstrates strong business credibility and user experience but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and maintain trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nostresscommerce.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Koongo operates in the e-commerce sector, providing essential services that enable online sellers to efficiently manage product feeds and synchronize orders across multiple marketplaces. Its business model is SaaS-based, targeting small to medium-sized e-commerce businesses and enterprises looking to scale their marketplace presence. The company leverages partnerships with affiliate programs and integrates with major platforms like Shopify, Magento, and WooCommerce. The presence of customer testimonials and third-party review badges enhances its market credibility. The company is based in Prague, Czech Republic, and maintains a consistent brand presence across its digital assets. The integration of multiple marketing and analytics tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy aimed at driving customer acquisition and retention.

Security posture

The website’s security maturity is currently low due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, exposing users to potential data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. While security headers such as X-Frame-Options and Content Security Policy are implemented, the short HSTS max-age and malformed CAA DNS records indicate incomplete security hardening. The DMARC policy is set to none, which does not enforce email authentication, potentially increasing phishing risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The site uses multiple third-party scripts and analytics tools, which require ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture requires immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhancement of DNS and email security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate supporting modern protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) to secure all website traffic.
  2. Correct and validate DNS CAA records to ensure proper certificate authority authorization.
  3. Enhance DMARC policy to quarantine or reject to improve email security and reduce phishing risks.
  4. Extend HSTS max-age and consider including subdomains and preload to enforce HTTPS usage.
  5. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  6. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NoStress Commerce s.r.o.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a modern front-end stack including jQuery and Modernizr. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Plausible Analytics, Intercom, and Reditus Affiliate system. Hosting is provided by Forpsi with DNS managed by their nameservers. Performance metrics are not available, but the site appears well-optimized for mobile with responsive design and clear navigation. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data describing the organization and website. However, the lack of SSL/TLS and weak DNS security configurations represent significant technical risks. The site uses a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, enhancing privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires urgent security upgrades to meet modern standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nostresscommerce.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nostresscommerce.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.