Skip to main content

Security report for norskefondy.cz

Ministerstvo financí ČR · Government · Czech Republic

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.eeagrants.cz is an official portal managed by the Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic, dedicated to the administration and dissemination of information regarding the EEA and Norway Grants. It serves as a governmental platform providing structured information about funding programs, calls for proposals, and bilateral cooperation. The site targets stakeholders within the Czech Republic involved in grant applications and management, reflecting a strong governmental presence and trustworthiness. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with integrations for Google Analytics and Matomo for visitor tracking and analytics. Cookiebot is used for comprehensive cookie consent management, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, although some modern security headers are not detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses a robust cookie consent mechanism, but lacks visible security headers and a published security or incident response policy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of WHOIS data is noted but likely due to registry policies rather than malicious intent. Overall, the website presents a professional, secure, and privacy-conscious platform appropriate for its governmental function. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and providing clearer contact information to improve transparency and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching norskefondy.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic operates this site as a key governmental entity managing EEA and Norway Grants. The business model is centered on public fund management and information dissemination rather than commercial revenue. The site positions itself as an authoritative source for grant-related information, targeting public institutions, NGOs, and other stakeholders in the Czech Republic. The partnership ecosystem includes links to the Ministry's main site and recognized third-party analytics and consent providers. Growth indicators are not directly visible but the site supports multiple program areas indicating broad governmental engagement. The platform is consistent with government digital service standards and maintains a clear, structured navigation system.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS and a detailed cookie consent mechanism supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security hardening. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is published, which limits transparency for security researchers. No incident response contact channels are visible. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries in the analyzed content. Compliance with GDPR is supported by cookie consent but lacks explicit privacy policy documentation. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a government informational site but could be improved with additional security best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and a dedicated vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting and improve security transparency.
  3. Develop and make accessible a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to strengthen GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide clear and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues arise.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ministerstvo financí ČR
Description
Ministerstvo financí - EHP a Norské fondy
Key services
Management of EEA and Norway Grants, Information dissemination about funding programs, Grant application and administration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Matomo Analytics, Cookiebot Consent Management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official Czech government website for EEA and Norway Grants.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent management implemented.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found.
  5. Uses Google Analytics and Matomo for analytics.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to registry policy.
  8. Website content is in Czech with English language option.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. Good mobile and accessibility features observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It integrates Google Analytics and Matomo for analytics and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is responsive and accessible, with good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. The site lacks some modern security headers and does not expose any sensitive information in the HTML. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain age and ownership verification. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and explicit hosting details.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with norskefondy.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review norskefondy.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.