Skip to main content

Security report for normand.lv

NORMAND ENTERPRISES · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Normand Enterprises is a Latvian company specializing in manufacturing and selling windows, doors, and wooden frame houses. Established in 2004, the company operates primarily in Latvia and the Baltic region, with some presence in Scandinavia. They have their own production facilities for plastic windows, doors, and wooden panel houses, and have completed over 40 wooden house projects. The website reflects a small but established business with a focus on quality and customer service. Technically, the website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, uses Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, and includes common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Fancybox. The site is mobile optimized and has a good user experience, though accessibility and SEO could be improved. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and policies. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and trustworthy but could benefit from enhanced privacy and security features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching normand.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Normand Enterprises holds a solid position in the regional construction materials market, focusing on windows, doors, and wooden houses. Their competitive advantage lies in their own manufacturing capabilities and long-standing experience since 2004. The business model combines product manufacturing with direct sales and installation services. Their target customers are homeowners and builders in Latvia and neighboring countries. The partnership ecosystem includes reputable companies such as Assa Abloy and Rehau, enhancing their market credibility. Growth indicators include expansion into wooden panel house production since 2012 and a portfolio of completed projects. The website content and partner logos support a professional image, though digital marketing and analytics usage appear minimal.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms or inputs are present that collect sensitive data, minimizing exposure risk. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not found, which could delay handling of security issues. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Establish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts and procedures.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NORMAND ENTERPRISES
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NORMAND ENTERPRISES
Description
Normand Enterprises offers windows, doors, and wooden frame houses with a focus on quality, energy efficiency, and security. They have experience since 2004, operate in Latvia, Baltics, and Scandinavia, and have their own production facilities for plastic windows, doors, and wooden panel houses.
Key services
Window systems, Door systems, Insect screens, Wooden frame houses
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox3, Bannerplay, ResponsiveVideos, Mozlive
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms detected collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No contact forms detected; contact info limited to phone and address.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or registrant info extracted.
  5. Website uses Mozello CMS and Cloudfront CDN for hosting and delivery.
  6. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Content is business focused, clean, and safe for general audiences.
  9. Partner logos and external links indicate established business relationships.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Mozello CMS and Cloudfront CDN for hosting and content delivery, ensuring reasonable performance and availability. The technology stack includes jQuery 2.2.4 and Fancybox3 for UI components, which are somewhat dated but functional. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. SEO optimization is basic, with canonical tags and meta viewport set, but lacks advanced SEO metadata like Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal data collection. The site could benefit from modernization of its tech stack and enhanced SEO and accessibility features to improve reach and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with normand.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review normand.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.