Skip to main content

Security report for norgram.co

Norgram® · Technology · Denmark

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Norgram® is a Denmark-based design studio specializing in creating iconic brands and digital experiences with a focus on essential design elements. The company targets an international clientele seeking high-quality visual identity, digital platforms, and creative direction services. The website showcases a professional portfolio with multimedia content, including Vimeo videos and high-quality images, reflecting a mature and consistent brand presence since 2016. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data but lacks explicit security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is fully redacted, typical for privacy protection, and does not raise immediate concerns given the professional website content. Overall, the site demonstrates a strong business credibility and technical foundation but should enhance privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching norgram.co

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Norgram operates as a small, essential entity within the technology and design sectors, focusing on branding and digital experience design. Its market position is that of a reputable international design studio with a portfolio spanning nearly a decade. The business model revolves around creative services, including brand identity and digital product design. The company leverages multimedia content to showcase its work and maintains a consistent brand image. The presence of a company domain email and social media link (Twitter) supports its professional outreach. However, the absence of physical addresses or phone numbers limits direct contact options. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content or WHOIS data. The company could benefit from formalizing privacy and security policies to align with industry standards and client expectations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No forms are present, reducing the risk of input-based vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, formal policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Norgram®
Description
Norgram® is a design studio based in Denmark—working internationally to design iconic brands and digital experiences with focus on what’s essential.
Key services
Visual identity, Art direction, Design, Digital design, Typography, Digital products, Digital experiences, Creative direction
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Vimeo video embeds, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected
  • Secure forms (no forms detected, so no input risk)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional design studio portfolio with rich multimedia content
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact information limited to a single company email in footer
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses found
  5. WHOIS data is fully redacted, limiting domain ownership transparency
  6. Uses modern web technologies and analytics
  7. No security headers detected in HTML content
  8. No forms detected on the homepage or main sections
  9. Good mobile optimization and navigation clarity
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Vimeo for video content delivery. The HTML structure is valid and includes proper meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph). The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and clear navigation. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. Performance is moderate, with some images and videos loaded asynchronously. The absence of forms reduces complexity and security risks. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of security headers and formal privacy mechanisms represents a modernization opportunity. Overall, the infrastructure supports a professional digital presence but should address security and compliance gaps to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with norgram.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review norgram.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.