Skip to main content

Security report for nordsystems.eu

Nord Systems SIA · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nord Systems SIA is a Latvia-based company specializing in quality control and marking systems for industrial applications. Their offerings include X-ray inspection, metal detectors, checkweighers, and various marking equipment such as label printers and laser marking systems. The company targets manufacturing and industrial sectors requiring high-quality inspection and marking solutions. The website reflects a professional B2B business model with a clear focus on industrial clients in the Baltic region and possibly wider Europe. Technically, the website uses a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and popular analytics tools like Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, some technical improvements could be made in accessibility and SEO optimization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes no visible exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers and does not publish privacy or cookie policies, nor incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. Analytics and tracking are moderately used without clear privacy compliance indicators. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nordsystems.eu

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nord Systems operates in a niche market providing industrial quality control and marking equipment. Their competitive advantage lies in offering a comprehensive range of inspection and marking solutions tailored for manufacturing clients. The business model is primarily B2B, focusing on equipment sales and possibly service contracts. The company maintains an active social media presence and showcases partnerships through a partner logos carousel, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include newsletter subscription and multimedia content showcasing products. The company appears small but established, with consistent branding and clear contact information enhancing credibility.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS but lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are published, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, limiting transparency in security management. Analytics tools are used extensively, but privacy compliance is weak. No forms on the site collect personal data directly, reducing immediate risk. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts to improve security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet modern standards and improve user experience.
  5. Establish and publish incident response contact information for security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nord Systems SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nord Systems SIA
Description
Nord Systems offers quality control (X-ray, metal detectors, checkweighers) and marking systems (industrial inkjet, label printers, laser, labeling systems).
Key services
Quality control equipment, Marking systems, Inspection systems, Label printers, Metal detectors, X-ray inspection, Checkweighers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Fonts, Font Awesome, Slick Carousel, Fancybox, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Typeform
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy or cookie policy found on the website.
  2. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  3. Website uses modern frontend technologies and analytics tools.
  4. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  5. No forms collecting personal data directly on the site except external newsletter subscription link.
  6. Social media presence is active and linked.
  7. No security or incident response policies published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Website content is professional and business-focused.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a solid and modern technology stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and popular libraries for UI components like Fancybox and Slick Carousel. Analytics and tracking are implemented via Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Microsoft Clarity, indicating a focus on user behavior insights. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The site is mobile-optimized and has clear navigation. However, SEO and accessibility could be improved. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site. Hosting provider details are not available from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nordsystems.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nordsystems.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.