Skip to main content

Security report for nordialaw.com

Nordia Law · Other · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nordia Law is a well-established pan-Nordic law firm founded in 1999, operating across Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden with five offices. The firm offers a broad range of legal services including banking and finance, competition law, dispute resolution, employment law, intellectual property, and more. Their market position is strong within the Nordic region, targeting businesses and individuals requiring legal expertise across multiple jurisdictions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern frameworks such as Foundation CSS and integrates marketing and analytics tools like HubSpot and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and published security policies. Overall, the security posture is solid with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but the absence of explicit security and incident response policies and DNSSEC implementation are areas for enhancement. The domain is long-standing and registered with a reputable registrar, supporting the legitimacy of the business. The website complies well with privacy regulations including GDPR, with clear privacy and cookie policies. The risk assessment is low with no signs of malicious activity or blocking mechanisms. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security policies, and enhancing security headers to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nordialaw.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
88
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nordia Law operates as a specialized legal services provider in the Nordic region, leveraging a multi-office presence to serve clients across Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Their competitive advantage lies in their pan-Nordic approach, offering seamless legal services across borders. The business model is based on professional legal consultancy with a focus on corporate and commercial law sectors. Revenue streams likely derive from client retainers, project-based legal services, and advisory roles. The firm targets corporate clients, legal departments, and individuals requiring cross-border legal expertise. Growth indicators include multilingual website support and active content updates. The partnership ecosystem includes international memberships and references, enhancing credibility and market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, and marketing scripts are managed through reputable platforms like HubSpot. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options represent potential areas of risk. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could impact preparedness and transparency. No vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were detected in the website content or WHOIS data. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved with formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nordia Law
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nordia Law
Description
NORDIA Law is a pan-Nordic Law firm, with five offices located in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. We provide efficient services locally and across.
Key services
Banking & Finance and Capital Markets, Competition & Public Procurement, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dispute Resolution, Employment Law, Insurance & Tort Law, Intellectual Property, Private Capital, Sports, Media and Entertainment Law, Mergers & Acquisitions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Foundation CSS, Slick Carousel, LazyLoad, Fancybox, HubSpot scripts
Frameworks
Foundation
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot, LeadFlows
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to a Nordic law firm.
  3. Multiple language options available indicating international targeting within Nordic countries.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of HubSpot and Google Tag Manager for marketing and analytics.
  7. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  8. Domain is old and registered with a reputable registrar.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end framework (Foundation CSS) and uses popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel. It integrates marketing and analytics tools including HubSpot and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with lazy loading implemented for images. Hosting appears stable with a reputable registrar and DNS provider. Technical debt is low, but improvements can be made in security configurations and accessibility features to enhance overall robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nordialaw.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nordialaw.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.