Skip to main content

Security report for nomor.se

Rentokil Initial · Other · Sweden

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rentokil Initial plc operates the website www.rentokil.com/se as a localized Swedish portal for its pest control and related environmental services. The company is a world leader in pest control, hygiene, and food safety services, with a strong market presence in Sweden supported by local offices and a century-long history dating back to 1925. The website offers comprehensive service information, customer portals, and educational resources, reflecting a mature and professional business model targeting both residential and commercial customers. Technically, the site uses modern analytics, tag management, and consent management tools, built on Magnolia CMS, with good mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not found. WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but the overall branding and content strongly indicate legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security headers, adding a vulnerability disclosure policy, and providing clear security incident contacts to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nomor.se

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rentokil Initial plc holds a leading position in the pest control industry with a diversified service portfolio including environmental testing, hygiene, and food safety. The acquisition of Nomor AB and integration of its services into the Rentokil brand in Sweden indicates strategic growth and consolidation. The business model focuses on service contracts with both residential and commercial clients, supported by digital customer portals and training platforms. The company leverages global innovation while maintaining local presence, enhancing customer trust and operational efficiency. The website content and structured data confirm a large enterprise with ISO certifications and a strong brand identity. Marketing and analytics tools are used responsibly with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of cookie consent management via OneTrust. Google Tag Manager and HubSpot scripts are loaded with consent categories, indicating privacy-aware tracking. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism represents a compliance gap. The WHOIS data is missing, which may indicate privacy protection or registry issues, slightly impacting trust. Overall, the site follows good security best practices but could improve transparency and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Create and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact information.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update accordingly.
  5. Enhance WHOIS transparency if possible to improve domain trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rentokil Initial
Description
Som världsledande leverantör av avancerade tjänster för skadedjurskontroll, är Rentokil experter på att skydda hem och företag mot skadedjursproblem.
Key services
Skadedjurskontroll, Miljötjänster, Matsäkerhetstjänster, Skadedjursbekämpning hos företag, Rapporter, Utbildning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (Universal Analytics and GA4), HubSpot, OneTrust Cookie Consent, YouTube iframe API, Magnolia CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and OneTrust scripts with consent categories

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (Universal Analytics), Google Analytics 4
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Ads Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and localized for Sweden
  2. Multiple login portals for customers indicate mature service offerings
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant
  4. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a major brand
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found
  6. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with consent management
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Magnolia CMS and uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (Universal and GA4), HubSpot marketing tools, and OneTrust for cookie consent. The site is well optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with preloading of critical CSS and fonts. The site integrates multiple customer portals and video content via YouTube iframe API. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, but hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nomor.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nomor.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.