Skip to main content

Security report for nolato.com

Nolato · Manufacturing · Sweden

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nolato is a global advanced high-tech solutions provider specializing in polymer-based product development and manufacturing. Their services span from concept development and product design to high-volume production, assembly, and logistics, targeting industries such as medical devices, pharma, automotive, and consumer electronics. The company positions itself as a strategic partner working closely with customers to deliver cost-effective and manufacturable polymer solutions. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for cookie consent management, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and includes comprehensive cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. Analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook pixels are used with transparency. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, and no public security policy or incident response information is available. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern and warrants further investigation to confirm domain registration legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front with good privacy compliance and technical implementation. The main risk lies in the missing WHOIS data and lack of explicit security policies, which should be addressed to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nolato.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nolato operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on polymer solutions for high-tech industries including medical devices, pharma, automotive, and consumer electronics. Their business model is B2B contract manufacturing and product development partnership. The company leverages early-stage collaboration with customers to optimize product success and cost efficiency. The website reflects a mature digital presence with integrated marketing and analytics tools, indicating a strategic approach to customer engagement and market positioning. No direct revenue or financial data is available, but the scale and scope suggest a large enterprise with global operations. The absence of WHOIS data is unusual and should be clarified to ensure domain ownership aligns with corporate identity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security baseline with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam and abuse on contact forms. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with granular user controls, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs are found, limiting transparency and preparedness. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, which is a critical trust factor. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing security policies, adding security headers, and clarifying domain registration details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear company contact emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries to improve transparency.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to confirm domain registration legitimacy and enhance trust.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
company Nolato
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nolato
Description
Nolato develops and produces polymer-based products including concept development, product design, process optimization, high-volume production, post-processing, assembly and logistics. They partner closely with customers to develop cost-effective, manufacturable products.
Key services
Polymer product development, Product design, Process optimization, High-volume production, Post-processing, Assembly, Logistics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.4.1, Bootstrap 4.5.2, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Font Awesome 5.15.1, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot pixel, Facebook pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie categories and granular controls
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers, only a contact form
  4. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  5. No visible terms of service page
  6. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not registered under queried WHOIS server
  7. Use of modern frontend frameworks and analytics tools
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely adopted frontend framework (Bootstrap) with multiple versions loaded, which could be optimized. Integration of Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot indicates a mature approach to analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility considerations, though these could be further enhanced. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML. Performance is moderate with room for improvement by optimizing resource loading and reducing redundant libraries. Security best practices are partially implemented but lack some critical headers and public security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nolato.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nolato.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.