Skip to main content

Security report for nokia.com

Nokia Corporation · Technology · Finland

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nokia Corporation is a globally recognized leader in telecommunications and technology infrastructure, providing mobile, fixed, and cloud network solutions. The company operates as a B2B technology provider serving enterprises, governments, and technology professionals worldwide. With a founding date of 1865 and a large enterprise size, Nokia maintains a strong market position supported by subsidiaries such as Nokia Networks and Nokia Bell Labs. The website reflects this stature with professional design, consistent branding, and comprehensive corporate information. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10 CMS and integrates advanced marketing and analytics tools including Marketo, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and New Relic. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic but functional. The site employs modern security headers and enforces HTTPS, indicating a strong security posture. However, explicit security policy pages and incident response contacts are not evident. Security-wise, the site demonstrates best practices such as content security policies and cookie consent mechanisms, with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of WHOIS data is noted but attributed to registry restrictions rather than suspicious activity. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained. Strategically, Nokia should consider publishing explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance transparency and trust. Improving accessibility and regularly auditing third-party scripts will further strengthen the security and user experience. These steps will support Nokia's reputation as a secure and reliable technology leader.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nokia.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nokia's market positioning as a global telecommunications leader is reinforced by its extensive product and service offerings in mobile, fixed, and cloud networks. The company targets enterprise and government sectors with a B2B business model. Its competitive advantages include a long history, strong brand recognition, and a diversified subsidiary ecosystem. Revenue streams likely derive from network infrastructure sales, technology licensing, and professional services. The website's integration with marketing automation and analytics tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. Partnerships and subsidiaries such as Nokia Bell Labs and NGP Capital suggest a broad innovation and investment footprint. The company's operations are global, with a strong presence in Europe and worldwide.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response contact page is a gap in transparency. The use of multiple third-party scripts and analytics tools necessitates ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. The WHOIS data unavailability is noted but does not detract from the overall trustworthiness given Nokia's corporate stature. The site would benefit from publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to align with best practices and improve incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards (e.g., WCAG 2.1 AA).
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nokia Corporation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nokia Corporation
Description
As a technology leader across mobile, fixed and cloud networks, our solutions enable a more productive, sustainable and inclusive world
Key services
Mobile networks, Fixed networks, Cloud networks, Technology solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10 CMS, Marketo marketing automation, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, New Relic monitoring, Boomerang performance monitoring, OneTrust cookie consent
Frameworks
Drupal
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic, Boomerang
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Marketo, New Relic
Marketing tools
Marketo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Corporate website with extensive structured data and metadata
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  5. No visible security policy or incident response contact pages
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to registry restrictions
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages Drupal 10 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system suitable for enterprise needs. Integration with Marketo, Google Tag Manager, and New Relic indicates advanced marketing automation and performance monitoring capabilities. The site uses modern web fonts, responsive design, and SEO-friendly metadata. Performance is moderate, with opportunities to optimize loading times further. Accessibility is basic, suggesting room for improvement to meet diverse user needs. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting Nokia's global digital presence effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nokia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nokia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.