Skip to main content

Security report for noemie-strouk.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.noemie-strouk.com is a Japanese language content site focused on eye-area esthetic treatments, specifically targeting care for wrinkles, sagging, and dark circles. It provides rankings and recommendations for esthetic salons and related skincare products, targeting an audience concerned with aging signs around the eyes. The business model appears to be content and affiliate marketing within a niche skincare segment. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, and SEO practices are minimal. Security posture is weak, with no visible HTTPS or security headers and no privacy or cookie policies present. The site uses tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro, indicating moderate user tracking without clear privacy compliance. WHOIS data is missing or indicates the domain is unregistered, which is a significant trust concern. Overall, the site is functional but lacks professional security, privacy, and business credibility indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching noemie-strouk.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site occupies a niche in the Japanese esthetic skincare market, focusing on eye-area treatments. It leverages affiliate marketing by linking to various external skincare and esthetic service domains. The lack of company information, certifications, or legal disclosures limits its credibility. The target audience is likely middle-aged Japanese consumers seeking anti-aging solutions. The business appears small-scale with limited digital maturity and no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth potential depends on improving trust signals and compliance with privacy regulations.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to risks such as data interception and clickjacking. No privacy or cookie policies indicate non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection laws. The site collects user data via tracking scripts without transparent disclosure. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. The missing WHOIS registration data further undermines trust and raises legitimacy concerns. Immediate improvements in encryption, privacy compliance, and transparency are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Publish verified company contact information including emails and phone numbers.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  5. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides information and rankings about eye-area esthetic treatments focusing on care for dark circles, sagging, and wrinkles. It promotes various salons and esthetic services specialized in eye skin care, highlighting treatments and benefits.
Key services
Eye-area esthetic treatment recommendations, Ranking and reviews of salons, Affiliate links to related skincare products and services
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. No HTTPS or security headers information available from provided data; assume minimal security posture.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information limited to a contact form; no emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Multiple external affiliate or related domains linked, mostly Japanese or skincare related.
  6. Tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro present, indicating user analytics and tracking.
  7. WHOIS data missing or domain unregistered, which is suspicious given active website content.
  8. Website uses Shift_JIS charset and Japanese language content focused on eye esthetic treatments.
  9. No social media links or company legal information found.
  10. Site structure is basic with minimal navigation and no advanced frameworks detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic web technologies without a CMS or advanced frameworks. The charset is Shift_JIS, indicating a focus on Japanese users. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern optimization techniques. Mobile responsiveness is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. The site includes external JavaScript for analytics but lacks modern SEO and accessibility best practices. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available. Technical debt is present due to outdated charset and lack of modern security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with noemie-strouk.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review noemie-strouk.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.