Skip to main content

Security report for nnzusa.com

NNZ United States · Manufacturing · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NNZ United States is a well-established multinational packaging company with a history dating back to 1922. The company specializes in providing customized packaging solutions primarily for the fresh produce and industrial sectors. It operates through a broad network of subsidiaries across Europe, North America, and Africa, positioning itself as a market leader with a strong emphasis on sustainability and innovation. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence, offering detailed product portfolios, sustainability initiatives, and corporate information. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern tools such as Gravity Forms and Google Tag Manager integrated for analytics and marketing. While the site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, it suffers from a critical security shortfall: the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which significantly impacts its security posture. Security headers are properly configured, but the lack of encryption undermines user trust and data protection. The company demonstrates good privacy compliance with clear privacy and cookie policies, including consent mechanisms. Contact information is readily available, including phone numbers, physical address, and contact forms, enhancing business credibility. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is found on the site. Overall, NNZ USA presents a strong business and digital profile but must urgently address its SSL/TLS configuration to improve security and trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in this area will enhance user confidence and align the website with modern security standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nnzusa.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NNZ USA operates as an essential entity within the manufacturing and retail packaging sectors, focusing on fresh produce and industrial packaging solutions. Its business model centers on independent advisory services combined with a broad portfolio of sustainable packaging products. The company leverages a multinational footprint with 24 subsidiaries, enabling extensive market reach and customer intimacy. Its competitive advantages include a long history, innovation-driven product development, sustainability commitments, and recognized certifications such as ISO and BRC. The company targets businesses requiring customized packaging solutions, emphasizing environmental impact and supply chain cooperation. Partnerships with organizations like EFIBCA, Plastic Pact, and Sedex further strengthen its market position and sustainability credentials.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with several positive practices such as the implementation of multiple security headers (X-Content-Type-Options, X-XSS-Protection, X-Frame-Options, Permissions-Policy, Referrer-Policy, and Strict-Transport-Security header present but not fully enabled). However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support represent a critical vulnerability, exposing users to potential data interception and undermining trust. No evidence of security or incident response policies is present, and no dedicated security contact channels are found. The site uses secure forms (Gravity Forms) but without HTTPS, data protection is compromised. No known vulnerabilities or malware detected, but the SSL/TLS gap is a significant compliance and security risk.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Activate and configure HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload flags to enforce HTTPS.
  4. Implement OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking performance and security.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website, including contact channels for security issues.
  6. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities.
  7. Enhance privacy compliance by explicitly naming a Data Protection Officer or contact point.
  8. Improve performance optimization to reduce page load times.
  9. Maintain consistent branding and trust signals across all regional sites.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with a custom theme 'nnz' and uses Gravity Forms for data collection. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking. The site uses jQuery and modern JavaScript for UI interactions. Hosting is provided by LinQhost HPW. Despite a well-structured and content-rich site, performance metrics indicate slow loading times, possibly due to unoptimized resources or server configuration. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, with responsive design and ARIA attributes. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The lack of SSL/TLS is a major technical debt and security risk. The site uses Redis Object Cache for performance optimization but still shows zero load time and resource count in provided data, indicating possible measurement issues or incomplete data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nnzusa.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nnzusa.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.