Skip to main content

Security report for nka.eu

Nedelka Kubáč advokáti s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nedelka Kubáč advokáti is a specialized law firm operating primarily in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, focusing on competition law, regulated sectors such as energy and telecommunications, foreign direct investment, public procurement, and compliance. The firm is recognized as a leading boutique legal service provider with a strong market position supported by international rankings and awards. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive presentation of their services, team, and recent legal news, targeting business clients requiring expert legal advice in their specialized fields. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Lodash, Velocity.js, and Slick Carousel to deliver a responsive and user-friendly experience. While the site is well-structured and mobile-optimized, it lacks some advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or analytics platforms are detected, indicating a custom or lightweight implementation. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, it lacks important security headers and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance trust and security posture. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, with strong business credibility but some gaps in privacy compliance and security best practices. Addressing these gaps would improve the firm's digital maturity and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nka.eu

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm holds a strong market position as a niche legal service provider specializing in competition law and regulated sectors in Central Europe. Their business model revolves around providing high-value legal consultancy and representation to corporate clients, including multinational corporations and investment groups. The firm demonstrates growth through high-profile cases, international recognition, and a well-qualified team with experience in regulatory bodies and international law firms. Their partnership ecosystem includes collaborations with regulatory authorities and industry stakeholders. The website content and news sections highlight ongoing successful engagements and thought leadership, indicating a robust and reputable operation.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and no obvious vulnerabilities in the website code or content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates a compliance gap with GDPR requirements. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which limits transparency and responsiveness to security issues. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a professional site but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended security headers, privacy documentation, and disclosure policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider integrating analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to monitor site performance and user engagement.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nedelka Kubáč advokáti s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ01894501
Registration number
01894501
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nedelka Kubáč advokáti s.r.o.
Description
Advokátní kancelář se sídlem v Praze a Bratislavě specializující se na české, slovenské a unijní právo, zejména právo hospodářské soutěže, regulovaná odvětví, prověřování zahraničních investic, veřejné zakázky a compliance.
Key services
Competition law advisory and representation, Regulated sectors legal consultancy, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) transaction assessments, Public procurement legal services, Compliance program development and training
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Lodash, Velocity.js, Slick Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URLs)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional legal services site specializing in competition law and regulated sectors.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses in Prague and Bratislava.
  4. No forms detected on the main page; no data collection forms present.
  5. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  6. Uses modern JavaScript libraries for UI but no CMS or analytics detected.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. Content is in Czech language with some Slovak references.
  9. Website is well structured with clear navigation and detailed content sections.
  10. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with libraries such as jQuery, Lodash, Velocity.js, and Slick Carousel for UI effects and responsiveness. The HTML structure is valid and semantic, supporting good SEO and accessibility foundations, though some improvements are possible. The site is mobile-optimized and loads a moderate number of assets, resulting in acceptable performance. No CMS or third-party analytics platforms are detected, suggesting a custom-built or static site approach. Hosting details are not explicit, but the domain uses HTTPS and is registered with a reputable Czech registrar. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nka.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nka.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.