Skip to main content

Security report for nk-neken.com

NEKEN · Manufacturing · France

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security and GDPR outside view.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NEKEN is a French manufacturer specializing in high-quality handlebars, triple clamps, and air clamps for off-road motorcycles, serving both professional and amateur riders. The company has a solid market position supported by endorsements from top motocross riders and a focus on product durability and rider comfort. Their business model centers on manufacturing and aftermarket sales with a medium-sized operation founded in 1990. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 7 with a variety of JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for user interaction and security. Hosting is provided by OVH, a reputable provider. Security posture is generally good with strong HTTP security headers and a valid SSL certificate, though the lack of modern TLS protocols and some CSP weaknesses suggest room for improvement. The site includes cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit privacy and terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Overall, the website is professional and well-branded but could enhance its security and compliance maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nk-neken.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NEKEN operates in the manufacturing sector focused on motorcycle parts, particularly for off-road and motocross markets. Their competitive advantage lies in product quality, innovation (e.g., NK-SFS air clamps), and professional rider endorsements. The company targets riders and aftermarket consumers, leveraging a direct sales and brand reputation model. Partnerships include web development with A3WEB.FR and social media engagement via Facebook. Growth indicators include continuous product development and testing. The company maintains a clear physical presence in France and a medium-sized business scale. Strategic observations suggest opportunities in expanding digital compliance and security transparency to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS with preload, X-Frame-Options, and a restrictive Referrer-Policy. The SSL certificate is valid but the absence of TLS 1.2 or 1.3 protocols is a notable gap. Content-Security-Policy allows unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval, which could expose the site to XSS risks. No privacy policy or incident response information is published, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and best practices. The use of Google reCAPTCHA and clear cookie consent mechanisms are positive security controls. No known vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or POODLE are present. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes are not visible, which could hinder timely security issue management.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 protocols to strengthen SSL/TLS security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Harden Content-Security-Policy by removing 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' directives.
  4. Implement a security.txt file and public vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is based on Drupal 7 CMS, which is an older but stable platform. The tech stack includes jQuery 1.10, Google reCAPTCHA, Greensock animation libraries, and embedded YouTube videos. Hosting is managed by OVH, a known European provider. Performance metrics indicate fast load times, though no detailed resource counts or page size data were available. Mobile optimization is good with responsive viewport settings and mobile menu support. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical debt is present due to older CMS and JavaScript versions, suggesting modernization opportunities. Security headers are well configured but SSL/TLS protocols need updating. Overall, the technical setup supports business operations effectively but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nk-neken.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nk-neken.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.