Skip to main content

Security report for nixor.ee

Nixor · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nixor is a technology solutions provider specializing in retail and IT infrastructure services. Their offerings include sales systems, self-service solutions, POS hardware, payment solutions, electronic shelf labels, weighing systems, security technology, business software, and IT infrastructure. The website targets businesses seeking integrated technology solutions in Estonia and the surrounding region. The company presents itself as a medium-sized, established player in the technology sector with a professional online presence. Technically, the website is built on the Odoo CMS platform, utilizing modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap and FontAwesome. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a multilingual experience with support for English, Estonian, Latvian, and Lithuanian. Performance is moderate, and SEO practices are adequately implemented. However, accessibility features are basic, and there is room for improvement in technical implementation. From a security perspective, the website lacks visible security headers and explicit security or privacy policies. There is no evidence of GDPR compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent banners or privacy policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which may impact trust and compliance. The absence of these elements suggests a need for enhanced security posture and privacy compliance. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in privacy, security, and compliance transparency to strengthen trustworthiness and meet regulatory expectations. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and establishing clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nixor.ee

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nixor operates in the technology sector with a focus on retail and IT infrastructure solutions. Their business model is B2B, targeting companies requiring integrated sales and payment systems, security technology, and business software. The company leverages partnerships and offers a broad portfolio of services, positioning itself as a comprehensive technology provider in its market. The website content and navigation reflect a mature business with clear service offerings and multilingual support, indicating regional market engagement. No parent or subsidiary relationships are evident. The absence of detailed company registration or VAT information limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is basic. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the provided data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or Strict-Transport-Security are detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. The lack of incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure policies further weakens the security maturity. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and compliance measures to reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Establish and disclose an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure process with dedicated contact channels.
  4. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve transparency by providing company registration details, data protection officer contact, and certifications if applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nixor
Description
Nixor provides technology solutions including sales systems, self-service, POS hardware, payment solutions, ESL, weighing systems, security technology, business software, and IT infrastructure.
Key services
Sales systems, Self-service solutions, POS hardware, Payment solutions, Electronic Shelf Labels (ESL), Weighing systems, Security technology, Business software, IT infrastructure
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Odoo, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Open Iconic
Frameworks
Odoo
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. Contact information includes phone links and contact page references but no explicit emails found.
  4. Website uses Odoo CMS and modern frontend libraries like Bootstrap and FontAwesome.
  5. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the HTML content.
  6. No visible social media links or email addresses found in the content.
  7. Language selector supports English (US), Estonian, Latvian, Lithuanian.
  8. Site content is business-focused with clear navigation and multilingual support.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files detected.
  10. No data protection officer or incident response contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by Odoo CMS, a modern and flexible platform suitable for business websites. Frontend technologies include Bootstrap for responsive design, FontAwesome for icons, and Open Iconic. The site uses deferred JavaScript loading to optimize performance. Meta tags for Open Graph and Twitter Cards are present, supporting social media sharing. Language selection is implemented with flags and localized URLs. The site includes search and login forms but lacks visible email collection forms. Hosting provider and SSL certificate details are not explicitly available in the provided content. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. SEO is supported by canonical links and structured navigation menus. Technical debt appears low but security-related technical improvements are needed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nixor.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nixor.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.