Skip to main content

Security report for nitrasmart.sk

Other · Slovakia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website nitrasmart.sk currently serves as a minimal placeholder or integration page with very limited content. It primarily loads an external JavaScript from Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, indicating a possible chatbot or webchat integration. There is no visible business description, contact information, or user-facing content to provide insight into the company's operations or services. The domain is registered since 2017 with a valid registration until 2026, consistent with a legitimate small business presence in Slovakia. However, the lack of content and policies suggests the site is either under development or used for a very narrow technical purpose. From a technical perspective, the site uses basic HTML with JavaScript and is hosted on Azure Blob Storage. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. The site lacks SEO optimization, accessibility features, and mobile responsiveness. Security headers are not detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, which impacts compliance and trust. Security posture is minimal but not alarming; HTTPS is assumed but not confirmed from the data. DNSSEC is enabled on the domain, which is a positive security indicator. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the limited content. Overall, the site scores low on content quality, privacy compliance, and business credibility due to the absence of meaningful content and policies. The overall risk is low in terms of malicious content but high in terms of trust and compliance due to missing policies and contact information. Strategic recommendations include adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, improving website content and structure, implementing security headers, and providing clear contact and business information to enhance credibility and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nitrasmart.sk

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nitrasmart.sk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for nitrasmart.sk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain nitrasmart.sk is registered in Slovakia and has been active since 2017. The website content does not provide any business intelligence such as company name, sector, or services. The hosting on Azure Blob Storage and the presence of a webchat integration script suggest a technology-related service or digital tool, possibly related to smart city or smart technology solutions given the domain name. However, no explicit business model, revenue streams, or target customer segments can be identified from the current content. There are no visible partnerships or certifications. The lack of content and policies limits the ability to assess market positioning or competitive advantages.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is basic. DNSSEC is enabled on the domain, which is a positive indicator for domain security. However, the website lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are important for protecting users against common web attacks. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or SSL configuration details in the provided data. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site does not expose any sensitive data or vulnerable libraries based on the limited content. Overall, the security maturity is low and improvements are needed to meet standard best practices and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced site-wide with a strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  4. Provide clear contact information and incident response details to enhance transparency and security readiness.
  5. Enhance website content quality, SEO, and accessibility to improve user experience and business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is extremely minimal with only a script loading from an external Azure Blob Storage URL.
  2. No metadata beyond basic charset, viewport, and title tags.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or forms present on the page.
  5. No social media links or business identifiers found.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. Website appears to be a placeholder or minimal integration page rather than a full business site.
  8. Hosting on Microsoft Azure Blob Storage suggests a static site or partial service integration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a minimal static HTML page that loads an external JavaScript from Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, indicating a lightweight integration or widget rather than a full website. No CMS or frameworks are detected. The site lacks meta tags beyond basic charset and viewport, and no SEO or accessibility features are implemented. Hosting on Azure Blob Storage suggests a cost-effective static hosting solution. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content but mobile optimization and accessibility are poor. The absence of security headers and policies indicates technical debt and potential risks. Modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS or framework for better content management, implementing SEO and accessibility standards, and improving security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nitrasmart.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nitrasmart.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.