Skip to main content

Security report for nitrado.net

marbis GmbH · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nitrado, operated by marbis GmbH, is a technology company specializing in providing instant and affordable game server rental services. The website targets gamers and gaming communities seeking reliable hosting solutions. The company appears to have a medium-sized operation with a professional online presence, leveraging modern web technologies such as Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS to deliver a responsive and user-friendly experience. Analytics and tracking tools like Google Tag Manager, Segment, Microsoft Clarity, and Sentry are integrated for performance monitoring and user insights. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS enforced, though the absence of security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, warranting further investigation. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and well-structured, but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer business contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nitrado.net

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
87
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nitrado.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
232,644
Employees
6
Customers
232,585
Third parties
53
Weak passwords
17%

Latest record dated 2026-05-26 · 1,036 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nitrado.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –files.nitrado.net2026-05-26
  • –marbis.nitrado.net2026-05-13
  • –oauth.nitrado.net2026-04-01
  • –oauth.nitrado.net2026-01-21
  • –nitrado.net2026-01-11

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nitrado operates in the technology sector, focusing on game server hosting. Its business model revolves around renting game servers instantly to a global audience of gamers. The company benefits from a consistent brand identity and a good market position as an established provider. Revenue streams likely include subscription-based server rentals and add-on services. The website's integration with multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a data-driven approach to customer engagement. However, the absence of explicit privacy and terms policies may impact user trust. The company does not publicly disclose detailed corporate structure or subsidiaries in the provided content. Strategic partnerships or payment processors are not explicitly identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and use of reputable third-party analytics and error tracking services. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, which limits transparency for security researchers. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. Incident response and security contact information are not provided, which could hinder timely communication in case of security events. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and formal disclosure policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish and publicize a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection officer to enhance incident response readiness.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
marbis GmbH
Description
Nitrado offers instant and affordable game server hosting services targeting gamers who want to rent gaming servers.
Key services
Game server rental, Instant server hosting, Affordable hosting plans
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, Tailwind CSS, Font Awesome Pro, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Sentry, Microsoft Clarity, Segment
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security and analytics scripts from trusted sources

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Segment, Microsoft Clarity, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Segment, Microsoft Clarity, Sentry
Marketing tools
Segment
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found in .NET registry WHOIS.
  3. Website uses modern frontend technologies and analytics tools.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information detected.
  7. Content is focused on game server rental services, safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern frontend technologies such as Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS, ensuring responsive design and good user experience across devices. Integration with analytics and error tracking services like Google Tag Manager, Segment, Microsoft Clarity, and Sentry indicates mature digital operations. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified from the content. The absence of visible security headers and formal privacy documentation suggests technical debt in compliance and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nitrado.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nitrado.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.