Skip to main content

Security report for ninjacasino.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ninja Casino operates as an online gambling platform offering casino games and sportsbook betting services primarily targeting adult users interested in online gaming and betting. The website employs modern frontend technologies such as React and integrates multiple third-party analytics and tracking services including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. A cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookiebot, indicating some level of privacy compliance. However, the absence of visible privacy policies, terms of service, and contact information on the site limits transparency and user trust. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and reduces overall trustworthiness. Security posture is moderate with no detected security headers and unknown SSL configuration, suggesting room for improvement in security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ninjacasino.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
98
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ninjacasino.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
25
Employees
0
Customers
25
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ninjacasino.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model centers on online gambling and sportsbook services, catering to adult audiences. The platform likely generates revenue through betting and gaming activities. The lack of visible company registration or contact details limits the ability to fully assess market positioning or partnerships. The presence of payment integration with Trustly and live chat support via casino.ladesk.com suggests operational maturity. However, the domain's WHOIS invisibility and missing compliance documentation may impact regulatory trust and user confidence. The platform appears to be medium-sized with a focus on the gambling sector.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate but incomplete. The site uses HTTPS, but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. The use of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and requires regular auditing. The absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security governance and incident readiness. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent but no visible privacy or data protection officer information. Overall, the site should enhance transparency, implement security headers, and publish clear security and privacy documentation to improve its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service on the website.
  2. Add visible and verified contact information including support emails and phone numbers.
  3. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact details to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and ensure SSL/TLS configurations are strong and up to date.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Online casino platform offering games and sportsbook services.
Key services
Online casino games, Sportsbook betting
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
React, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Firebase Messaging, Sentry
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an online casino and sportsbook platform targeting adult users.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookiebot.
  4. Multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts are used.
  5. No visible contact information or privacy policy found in the provided content.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL status unknown.
  7. Website uses modern frontend technologies including React.
  8. Content is primarily gambling-related and adult-oriented but safe in terms of explicit content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React and loads numerous JavaScript bundles asynchronously, indicating a modern single-page application architecture. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot for cookie consent, Firebase for messaging, and Sentry for error tracking. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and preconnect hints for performance. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was identified. Performance is moderate with potential for optimization due to the large number of script files. Accessibility and SEO are basic but could be improved with better metadata and structured data implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ninjacasino.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ninjacasino.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.