Skip to main content

Security report for nim.bi

Nimbi · Technology · Brazil

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website analyzed is a subdomain of nimbi.com.br, serving as a login portal for the Nimbi platform. The specific page is a 404 Not Found error page indicating that the requested link no longer exists and provides a link to the login page. The business appears to be technology-focused, providing platform access likely for clients or employees. The technical infrastructure is based on ASP.NET Web Forms and the OutSystems low-code platform, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure. The site shows basic mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is average with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies. No analytics or advertising scripts were detected, and no contact or business information is disclosed on this page. The domain WHOIS data is consistent with the business branding and shows active registration with AWS nameservers. Overall, the site is functional but minimal in content and security disclosures, scoring below average in AI evaluation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nim.bi

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
90
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nimbi operates a technology platform accessible via login, targeting users who require access to its services. The business model is platform-based, likely SaaS or enterprise software. The market positioning and competitive advantages cannot be fully assessed from this page alone. The company uses modern cloud hosting and low-code development platforms, indicating a focus on rapid deployment and scalability. There is no visible evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries on this page. The lack of public contact or policy information suggests this page is not intended for public marketing but for authenticated users.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is used, but no advanced security headers or policies are present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The form uses standard ASP.NET hidden fields but lacks visible advanced protections. No WAF or security challenge was detected. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and enhancing security controls on forms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve transparency.
  4. Enhance form security with anti-CSRF tokens and input validation.
  5. Improve SEO and content quality to provide better user experience and trust signals.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nimbi
Description
The website appears to be related to Nimbi, likely providing login access to a service or platform named 'Nimbi Login'. The page is a 404 Not Found error page indicating the requested link no longer exists and redirects users to the login page.
Key services
Login access to Nimbi platform
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET Web Forms, FontAwesome 5.13.0, OutSystems platform
Frameworks
OutSystems
Platforms
Windows Server (implied by ASP.NET Web Forms)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL scheme https://)
  • Form uses standard ASP.NET anti-forgery hidden fields

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. The page is a 404 Not Found error page for a login portal.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present on this page.
  3. No contact information or security policies are disclosed.
  4. The site uses OutSystems low-code platform and ASP.NET Web Forms technology.
  5. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  6. No social media or external business links found on this page.
  7. The domain is hosted on AWS infrastructure with multiple AWS nameservers.
  8. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  9. Content is minimal and focused on redirecting users to the login page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses ASP.NET Web Forms technology combined with the OutSystems low-code platform, hosted on AWS infrastructure. The page loads FontAwesome icons and uses standard HTML5 and CSS3. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced SEO optimization. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from updated security practices and improved accessibility features. The site lacks analytics and marketing tools, indicating a focus on internal or authenticated user access rather than public marketing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nim.bi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nim.bi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.