Skip to main content

Security report for nilpeter.com

Nilpeter · Manufacturing · Denmark

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nilpeter is a well-established global manufacturer specializing in flexo, offset, and digital printing solutions primarily for narrow and mid-web labels and flexible packaging. The company maintains a strong market position as a world-leading provider with a comprehensive product portfolio including presses and value-adding units, supported by extensive customer care services. Their global footprint includes manufacturing sites and subsidiaries across Denmark, USA, UK, Brazil, India, and Thailand, reflecting a mature international presence. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with integrations such as Gravity Forms for data collection, Yoast SEO for optimization, and Cloudflare for hosting and CDN services. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness, accessibility, and SEO practices, supported by a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare as a registrar and CDN, which enhances security and performance. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and there is a lack of explicit security policies or incident response information publicly available. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, indicating a solid security posture but with room for improvement in transparency and advanced security headers. Overall, Nilpeter's website reflects a professional, trustworthy, and technically competent digital presence suitable for its industry and audience. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing detailed security and incident response policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to further enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nilpeter.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
88
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nilpeter operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on printing technology, targeting label and flexible packaging producers worldwide. Their business model centers on manufacturing and selling advanced printing presses and complementary value-adding units, supplemented by customer care services such as maintenance, refurbishment, and training. The company leverages a global network of subsidiaries and manufacturing sites to serve diverse markets, indicating a scalable and diversified revenue stream. Their strong branding, consistent content quality, and active social media presence support market positioning as an industry leader. The website's content and structure suggest a focus on B2B customers seeking high-quality printing solutions and support services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and Cloudflare integration providing DDoS protection and CDN services. The domain registration is transparent and consistent with the business identity. The presence of a detailed cookie consent banner indicates GDPR awareness and compliance efforts. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS reduces the overall security robustness. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information is published, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but improvements in security transparency and technical controls are recommended to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive security policies and incident response procedures on the website.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Maintain and regularly update cookie and privacy policies to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance and transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nilpeter
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nilpeter
Description
Nilpeter is the world-leading manufacturer of flexo, offset, and digital printing solutions for narrow and mid web labels and flexible packaging
Key services
Flexo presses, Offset presses, Digital printing solutions, Value-adding units, Customer care including refurbishment, maintenance, training, and spare parts
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO, Cloudflare CDN, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie policy

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Leadinfo
Marketing tools
Gravity Forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong global presence with multiple offices and manufacturing sites
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  6. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress)
  7. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
  8. No critical security issues detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a modern theme and uses Gravity Forms for data collection and Yoast SEO for optimization. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Leadinfo for analytics and tracking. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site includes multimedia content such as videos and interactive maps, indicating a rich user experience. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The technical stack is current with no deprecated or vulnerable libraries detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and DNS security to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nilpeter.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nilpeter.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.