Skip to main content

Security report for nikon.sk

Nikon · Technology · Slovakia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nikon's Slovak website serves as a localized platform for showcasing and selling Nikon's digital cameras, lenses, and photographic accessories. The site targets photography enthusiasts and professionals in Slovakia, providing product information, firmware updates, and promotional content. The website reflects Nikon's strong global brand presence with consistent branding and a professional design. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including React, Google Tag Manager, and Microsoft Application Insights for analytics, alongside OneTrust for cookie consent management. The website is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies or incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is partially addressed through cookie consent, but no privacy policy or terms of service pages were detected in the provided content. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the Nikon brand, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nikon.sk

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nikon operates in the technology sector, specifically in digital imaging and photography equipment. The Slovak site is part of Nikon's regional presence, supporting sales and marketing efforts in Slovakia. The business model focuses on product sales and customer engagement through firmware updates and photography competitions. The site links to multiple Nikon regional domains, indicating a broad partnership and subsidiary ecosystem. The lack of visible contact information and privacy policies suggests areas for improvement in customer support and compliance transparency. The use of advanced analytics and cookie consent tools indicates a moderate level of digital maturity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented via OneTrust. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts introduces potential privacy risks if not properly managed. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents, including a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts to ensure no vulnerable or privacy-invasive components are used.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nikon
Description
Nikon offers digital cameras, lenses, and photographic accessories.
Key services
Digital cameras, Lenses, Photographic accessories, Firmware updates, Photography competitions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights, Swiper.js
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and localized for Slovakia.
  2. Strong brand presence with consistent Nikon branding.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism implemented via OneTrust.
  4. No visible privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React, indicating a modern front-end framework. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Application Insights for analytics and monitoring. The presence of OneTrust scripts shows compliance efforts for cookie management. The site uses Swiper.js for carousel functionality. Performance appears moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization. However, no CMS or hosting provider details were detected. The site lacks some advanced SEO and accessibility features, which could be improved to enhance discoverability and usability. No critical technical vulnerabilities were identified in the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nikon.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nikon.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.