Skip to main content

Security report for niedersachsen.de

Niedersächsische Landesregierung · Government · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Portal Niedersachsen website serves as the official digital gateway for the Lower Saxony state government in Germany. It provides comprehensive information on government ministries, political affairs, social services, cultural activities, emergency monitoring, and integration programs. The site targets residents, government officials, refugees, and the general public interested in state-related information. It is positioned as an authoritative and trusted source for regional governance and public services. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Video.js, FancyBox, Slick Carousel, DataTables, and Piwik/Matomo for analytics. The CMS powering the site is identified as Powerslave Liveserver, an enterprise content management system. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, although performance is moderate. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and follows best practices such as secure form handling and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are recommended for enhanced security and privacy compliance. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is publicly available. Overall, the website is a professional, trustworthy government portal with excellent content quality and user experience. The domain registration is consistent with official use, though WHOIS data is limited due to DENIC privacy policies. Strategic improvements include implementing security headers, cookie consent, and publishing security policies to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of niedersachsen.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching niedersachsen.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention niedersachsen.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,927
Employees
19
Customers
2,839
Third parties
69
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-06-08 · 116 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for niedersachsen.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sts.justiz.niedersachsen.de2026-06-08
  • –sts.justiz.niedersachsen.de2026-06-06
  • –owa.justiz.niedersachsen.de2026-06-01
  • –sts.justiz.niedersachsen.de2026-05-20
  • –sts.justiz.niedersachsen.de2026-05-12

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents the Lower Saxony state government, a large government entity operating in the public sector. Its business model is informational and service-oriented, providing citizens and stakeholders with access to government resources, news, and services. The portal supports multiple languages, reflecting a diverse audience including refugees and international visitors. It maintains partnerships with related government initiatives and integration programs. The site’s market position is authoritative within its jurisdiction, serving as the primary digital interface for state governance and public communication. Growth indicators include active content updates and integration of digital services. The partnership ecosystem includes official ministries and social initiatives, enhancing its reach and impact.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure handling of user inputs. The absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are notable gaps that could expose users to certain risks such as clickjacking or content injection. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency and user confidence in security incident handling. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the presence of a comprehensive privacy policy. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adopting additional security headers, explicit consent mechanisms, and public security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Introduce a clear cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to increase trust and preparedness for security incidents.
  4. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility by providing official emails and phone numbers for public inquiries and support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Niedersächsische Landesregierung
Description
Official portal of the Lower Saxony state government providing information about politics, state administration, culture, social services, energy, emergency monitoring, and integration initiatives.
Key services
Information on ministries and government, Public service portals, Emergency and crisis information, Cultural and tourism information, Integration and social initiatives
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, Video.js 7.20.1, FancyBox, Slick Carousel, DataTables, Piwik/Matomo Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected
  • Forms use POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik/Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik/Matomo
Marketing tools
Piwik/Matomo Analytics
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official government website for the state of Lower Saxony, Germany.
  2. Comprehensive content covering politics, culture, emergency info, and social services.
  3. Multiple language options available.
  4. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  5. Uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries.
  6. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible on main page; contact form available.
  8. Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, YouTube.
  9. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  10. WHOIS data limited due to DENIC privacy policies but consistent with official use.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust enterprise CMS (Powerslave Liveserver) and uses a modern JavaScript technology stack including jQuery, Video.js, FancyBox, Slick Carousel, and DataTables. Analytics are handled via Piwik/Matomo, indicating a preference for privacy-respecting tools. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich media content and multiple scripts. There is no indication of outdated or vulnerable libraries. The site lacks some modern security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms, which are technical debt areas to address. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but the domain and nameservers are official and consistent with government infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 57/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with niedersachsen.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review niedersachsen.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.