Skip to main content

Security report for nicholsonrevell.com

Nicholson Revell Personal Injury Attorneys · Other · United States

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nicholson Revell Personal Injury Attorneys is a well-established legal firm based in Georgia, specializing in personal injury and wrongful death cases. The firm targets individuals seeking expert legal representation in accident and injury law within the Augusta region. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, offering clear information about their services and contact options. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, leveraging modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Gravity Forms, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though there is room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and reCAPTCHA for form protection but lacks DNSSEC and some recommended security headers, which could be addressed to enhance security posture. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, showing a long-standing presence and no suspicious patterns. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a gap in privacy compliance that should be remedied to meet regulatory standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nicholsonrevell.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm operates in the legal services sector, focusing on personal injury law, which is a niche but essential market segment. Their business model revolves around client representation and legal consultation, likely generating revenue through contingency fees and legal retainers. The website's SEO optimization and social media presence suggest active marketing efforts to capture local clientele. The firm appears to maintain a small but professional operation with a clear market position in Georgia. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent practice. The lack of explicit certifications or security policies on the site suggests potential areas for business process improvement, especially in compliance and trust-building measures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam and abuse. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely communication in case of security incidents. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also reflects compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR and other data protection regulations. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the provided content, but continuous monitoring and updates are recommended to maintain security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize exposure to known vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nicholson Revell Personal Injury Attorneys
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nicholson Revell Personal Injury Attorneys
Description
Nicholson Revell Personal Injury Attorneys is made up of experienced Georgia injury attorneys who will fight for your case.
Key services
Personal injury legal representation, Wrongful death cases, Accident law services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO, Business Reviews Bundle plugin, Call Now Button plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Client-side form validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Business Reviews Bundle
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional legal services firm specializing in personal injury law in Georgia, USA.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with clear contact information and service descriptions.
  3. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  4. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lacks DNSSEC and security headers.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress CMS with SEO optimization via Yoast plugin.
  6. No evidence of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-standing domain ownership.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing popular plugins for SEO, forms, and business reviews, indicating a mature and maintainable technical infrastructure. The use of Google Fonts, Analytics, and Tag Manager reflects standard modern web practices. Performance is moderate, with mobile optimization rated good, though accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site lacks DNSSEC and some security headers, which are technical risks that could be mitigated. Overall, the technical stack supports the business needs effectively but would benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nicholsonrevell.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nicholsonrevell.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.