Skip to main content

Security report for nice-pak.co.uk

Nice-Pak International · Manufacturing · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nice-Pak International operates as a leading manufacturer of wet wipes, serving major brands and retailers globally. The company positions itself as a trusted supplier within the manufacturing sector, focusing on B2B relationships. The website reflects a professional digital presence built on WordPress, leveraging common SEO and cookie compliance tools to ensure regulatory adherence and user experience. The technical infrastructure is modern and includes Google Analytics for performance insights. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly disclosed. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain registration issues, which introduces some legitimacy concerns that should be addressed. Overall, the website is well-designed, compliant with privacy regulations, and serves its business purpose effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nice-pak.co.uk

This scan found 24 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses and retailers requiring wet wipe manufacturing services, operating in the manufacturing sector with a large-scale business model. The website content and metadata emphasize trust and reliability, supported by privacy compliance and professional branding. The absence of a registered WHOIS record for the exact domain queried suggests the company may use a different official domain or subdomain structure. The business model is focused on manufacturing and supply chain partnerships, with no direct consumer sales evident. The presence of a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism indicates awareness of regulatory requirements, supporting business credibility. The company appears to maintain a moderate digital marketing footprint, with Google Analytics and SEO tools in use.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes multiple security headers such as HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and Content-Security-Policy, indicating a good baseline security posture. Cookie consent is managed via a dedicated plugin, ensuring GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a security policy or incident response contact information limits transparency in security governance. The lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure mechanism suggests room for improvement in security communication and incident handling readiness. Overall, the site demonstrates good technical security hygiene but could enhance its security culture and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Register and use a consistent official domain name with valid WHOIS records to improve legitimacy and trust.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Add clear company contact phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nice-Pak International
Description
Nice-Pak is a leading wet wipe manufacturer. We are trusted by many of the world's biggest brands and retailers.
Key services
wet wipe manufacturing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Analytics, Real Cookie Banner plugin, Bold Timeline plugin, Enfold theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and fully functional with no blocking detected
  2. Professional manufacturing business website focused on wet wipes
  3. Good privacy and cookie compliance with explicit consent mechanism
  4. No visible security or privacy policy pages beyond privacy policy
  5. No WHOIS data available for exact domain queried, indicating domain naming or registration issues
  6. Use of standard WordPress plugins and themes with Google Analytics integration
  7. No contact phone number explicitly found; only email and contact form
  8. No terms of service or security incident response information publicly available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme and several plugins including Yoast SEO, Real Cookie Banner, and Bold Timeline. It uses jQuery and Google Analytics for functionality and tracking. The site loads multiple CSS and JS resources efficiently and includes preloading hints for performance optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented with Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and compliant web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nice-pak.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nice-pak.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.