Skip to main content

Security report for nfjz.cz

Nadační fond Josefa Zezulky · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadační fond Josefa Zezulky is a Czech non-profit foundation dedicated to promoting the life philosophy of Being and biotronic healing methods as introduced by Josef Zezulka. The foundation supports social help centers, alternative healing, healthy lifestyle promotion, and publishing activities. The website serves as an informational and donation platform with clear contact details and bank account information. Technically, the site uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and bxSlider, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile responsive and visually consistent, providing a good user experience. Security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities but lacks security headers and formal policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness but the site content and contact info appear legitimate for a small non-profit. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and targeted at a general audience interested in alternative healing and philosophy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nfjz.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in a niche sector focused on alternative healing and social support. It targets a general audience interested in biotronic healing philosophy. The business model is non-profit, relying on donations and support activities. The website links to partner domains related to events and publications, indicating an ecosystem of related organizations. The foundation appears small in size with no subsidiaries or parent company. The lack of WHOIS data and privacy policies are notable gaps. The site’s content quality and branding are consistent, supporting credibility. The use of Google Tag Manager suggests moderate user tracking. The foundation’s market position is niche but stable within its community.

Security posture

The website has a moderate security posture. It uses HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly confirmed), includes no exposed sensitive data, and uses common JavaScript libraries without known vulnerabilities. However, it lacks security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. The WHOIS data is missing, which reduces domain trust. Overall, the site is low risk but could improve security and compliance maturity significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration if not already done.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Deploy security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to improve incident response readiness.
  5. Consider adding contact phone numbers and social media links to enhance business credibility and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nadační fond Josefa Zezulky
Registration number
02518082
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadační fond Josefa Zezulky
Description
Nadační fond Josefa Zezulky is a foundation supporting activities related to the life philosophy of Being and Biotronic healing as introduced by Josef Zezulka. It promotes social help centers, alternative healing methods, healthy lifestyle, and publishing activities.
Key services
Support and operation of Biotronic social help center, Development of biotronic healing methods, Promotion of alternative healing and healthy lifestyle, Publishing and educational activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.1.1, bxSlider 4.2.12, jquery.unveil 1.3.0, simplelightbox 1.15.1, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small non-profit foundation site with clear mission and contact info.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No security.txt or incident response info present.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment.
  5. Uses common JavaScript libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  6. No signs of adult or inappropriate content.
  7. No phone numbers found with clear company context.
  8. No social media links detected.
  9. Site is mobile responsive and visually consistent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional front-end stack with jQuery 3.1.1, bxSlider for image sliders, jquery.unveil for lazy loading images, and simplelightbox for gallery lightbox effects. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile responsive with CSS media queries adjusting embedded video sizes and layout. No CMS or backend technology is detected from the HTML. Performance is moderate with some external dependencies on CDNs. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph tags. The site could benefit from modernizing JavaScript libraries and improving accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nfjz.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nfjz.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.