Skip to main content

Security report for nexia.ge

Nexia TA · Other · Georgia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nexia TA's website currently serves as a 'Coming Soon' placeholder, indicating an upcoming launch or redevelopment. The company appears to be a professional services firm located in Georgia, with contact details including a physical address, phone number, and official email. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and multiple Jet plugins, reflecting a modern but basic technical infrastructure. While HTTPS is enabled, the site lacks advanced security headers and privacy policies, which are critical for compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data transparency limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates basic digital maturity but requires significant improvements in security and privacy compliance to meet industry standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nexia.ge

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets Georgian clients, likely in professional services such as accounting or consulting, given the Nexia brand association. The minimal content and lack of detailed service descriptions suggest the company is either newly established or updating its digital presence. The presence of official contact information supports operational legitimacy. The business model appears service-oriented with a focus on local market engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The website's current state limits insights into revenue streams or competitive positioning.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption but lacks critical security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which help mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, reducing preparedness transparency. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts beyond social sharing are detected, minimizing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires enhancements to protect user data and build trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance WHOIS transparency or provide domain registration details to improve trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nexia TA
Description
ნექსია ჯორჯია, მ. ალექსიძის ქ. 12, King David-ის ბიზნეს ცენტრი, A ბლოკი, თბილისი 0171, საქართველო T: (+995) 032 256 06 25, E-mail: info@nexia.ge
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, AddToAny, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Roboto, Montserrat)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
AddToAny
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a 'Coming Soon' placeholder with minimal content
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact information is present and appears valid
  4. Uses WordPress with Elementor and multiple Jet plugins
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond AddToAny sharing
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and a suite of Jet plugins, indicating a flexible and extensible platform. The use of Google Fonts and Font Awesome enhances visual appeal. Performance is moderate, with no major blocking scripts detected. Mobile optimization is good due to responsive design. However, SEO optimization is basic, with minimal meta descriptions and no visible structured data beyond a simple JSON-LD WebPage schema. Accessibility features are limited but present at a basic level. The site would benefit from performance tuning and enhanced SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nexia.ge. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nexia.ge.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.